SRINIVASAN
All India Lawyers Union, Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, rep. by its Secretary to Government – Respondent
1. The former is a Writ Petition presented by All India Lawyers Union, Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary with a prayer for issue of a writ of declaration declaring that the practising advocates in the State of Tamil Nadu are entitled to be included in the Category of Non-OYT Special and consequently directing the Chief General Manager, Tamil Nadu Telecommunications Circle, Madras and the Chief General Manager, Madras Telephones (Respondents 2 and 3) to treat the applications of practising Advocates/Lawyers in Tamil Nadu in the Non-OYT Special Category and provide telephone connections to them. The first respondent is the Union of India represented by its Secretary to Government, Department of Communications. The latter is a Writ Miscellaneous Petition for an interim direction pending disposal of the Writ Petition. In paragraph 3 of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is stated that the petitioner is an All India body of Lawyers, whose members are practising Lawyers, retired Judges, Jurists and Law students and that it has branches all over the country having its Head Quarters at Delhi. It is also stated that in each State, the Union has Preside
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.