P.THANGAVEL
D. B. Kingsley – Appellant
Versus
Shoba Viswanathan – Respondent
1. C.R.P.No.2848 of 2000 has been filed by the tenant, against the judgment dated 6.6.2000, and made in R.C.A.No.899 of 1993, on the file of the VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, confirming the order and decretal order dated 30.6.1993 and made in R.C.O.P.No.2788 of 1990 on the file of the XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras ordering eviction, on the ground of wilful default. C.R.P.Nos.2840, 2849 and 2850 of 2000 have been filed by the tenant against the common order, dated 6.6.2000, passed by the VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, dismissing M.P.Nos.131, 130 and 69 of 1999, in R.C.A.No.899 of 1993, filed for receipt of additional grounds, additional documents and additional evidence, respectively.
2. With the consent of both sides, these civil revision petitions are taken up for the final disposal.
3. The respondent herein, who is the petitioner before the Rent Controller, is the owner of the property described in the rent control petition and the said property was leased out by her for residential purposes on a monthly rent of Rs.1,500 to one M/s.Needle Industries India Ltd., in which the revision petitioner herein, who is the respondent before the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.