SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 5467

T.MATHIVANAN
V. Savitha Devi – Appellant
Versus
S. Kalaikumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C.S. Dhanasekaran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R. Murali, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioners herein have come forward with this petition to call for the records in connection with the case in CC.No.855 of 2010 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore, and to quash the proceedings.

2. The facts which are absolutely necessary for the disposal of this petition may be summarised briefly as follows;

3. The petitioners being the accused in the case in CC.No.855 of 2010 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore are facing the charges under Section 209, 211 r/w 109 of IPC. The first petitioner is the wife of the second petitioner. The third petitioner is the father of the first petitioner. The fourth petitioner is an associate of the petitioners 1 to 3. Petitioners 1 and 2 are running a petrol bunk under the name and style of M/s. Samyuktha Corporation and the third respondent being the father of the first respondent has been assisting them in their business.

4. That on 05.07.2006, the petitioners 1 and 2 in the presence of the third petitioner had borrowed a sum of Rs.5lakhs from the respondent by way of a pay order bearing No.00






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top