SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 223

V.BHARGAVA, V.RAMASWAMI, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
M. L. Sethi – Appellant
Versus
R. P. Kapur – Respondent


Advocates:
FRANK ANTHONY, J.C.TALVAR, M.L.Sethi, O.P.RANA, R.L.Kohli, R.P.KAPUR

Judgment

BHARGAVA, J. : This appeal filed under certificate granted by the High Court at Allahabad is directed against an order passed by that Court dismissing a revision application by which the appellant, M. L. Sethi, desired the vacation of an order passed by the Sessions Judge of Saharanpur upholding two orders of the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Saharanpur, dated 6th August, 1963 and 5th October, 1963. By these orders the Magistrate dismissed two applications presented by the appellant for dismissing a complaint pending before him for commission of offences under Sections 211, 204 and 385 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. A further prayer was made for an order by this Court quashing the proceedings pending in the Court of that Magistrate.

3. The facts necessary for deciding this appeal may be stated briefly. On December, 10, 1958, the appellant lodged a report with the Inspector-General of Police. Chandigarh, against R. P. Kapur (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent") and his mother-in-law charging them with commission. of offences punishable under Sections 420. 109. 114 and 120-B. I. P. C. It does not appeal to be necessary to give the details of the allegations









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top