SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 2125

R.BANUMATHI, S.VIMALA
Lakshmi Matriculation School, (Formerly known as TVS Nursery & Primary School), Othapatti, represented by the Secretary – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, The Secretary to Government, Education Department – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for K. Harishnkar, R. Muthukumaraswamy, Senior Counsel for T.K. Bhaskar, R. Krishnamurthy, Senior Counsel for S. Thanka Sivan, R. Bharath Kumar, S. Silambanan, Senior Counsel for M/s. Profexs Associates, S. Silambanan, Senior Counsel for M.J. Jaseem Mohmed,
N.R. Chandran, Senior Counsel for R. Natarajan, R. Kannan, N. Sivakumar, Vijaya Narayanan, Senior Counsel for Dr. P. Vasudevan, R. Venkatavaradan, AR.L. Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for L. Murali Krishnan, Mrs. Chitra Sampath, T.S. Baskaran, V. Raghavachari, Fr.A. Xavier Arulraj, B. Rabu Manohar, B. Kannan, P.Harikrishnan, K. Harishankar, Srinath Sridevan, Srinath Sridevan, S. Venkatesh, M.Senthil Kumar, A. Ramesh, K. Rajasekaran, T.N. Sugesh, G. Sankaran, Cherian Mathews, Isaac Mohanlal, Satish Parasaran, Sai Bharath and Ilan, S. Thanjai, P.N. Chezhian, T.E. Badrinathan, P. Venugopal, T. Gandhi, A.S. Thambuswamy, C.P. Sivamohan, N. Umapathi, M/s. Royan Law Associates, N. Aravindkumar, M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co., S. Kamadevan, N. Anand Venkatesh, M/s. Aiyar and Dolia,
R. Suresh Kumar, M. Naraayanaswamy, N. Manokaran, S. Vijayakumar, K. Kuppusamy, R. Shankaranarayanan, R. Karthikeyan, M/s. L. Surya Associates, M/s. Paul and Paul, V. Srinivasa Babu, P. Satish, N.D. Dinesh, N.V.N.Margandeyan, V. Sanjeevi, A.D. Jagadish Chandira, K. Kalyanasundaram, Srinivasa Mohan, V.G. Suresh Kumar, S.K. Balashanmugam, C.K.M. Appaji, R. Murugabharathi, G. Thilakavathy, S. Sathyanarayanan, S. Saravanan, M. Govindarraj, B.T. Seshadri, V. Ayyadurai, K. Lavan, M/s. S.B.S. Raman and Associates, P. Nagaraju, V.V. Giridhar, M/s. Sunil Sudhakar Shankar, Kandhavadivel Duraisami, V.P. Sengottuvel, C.K. Chandrasekar, T. Sundaravadanam, R. Neelakandan, R. Ramachandran, A. Jenasenan, Advocates. For the Respondents:A. Navaneethakrishnan, Advocate General, assisted by S. Venkatesh, Govt. Pleader, E. Sampathkumar, Spl. Govt. Pleader (Edn.), P. Sanjaigandhi, Addl. Govt. Pleader (Edn.).

Judgment :

Common Order

R.BANUMATHI,J.

1. The writ petitioners, who are unaided private schools, have filed these writ petitions challenging the final order/ fee structure prescribed by School Fee Determination Committee on the ground of arbitrariness and that it is not in conformity with Tamilnadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act 2009 (Tamil Nadu Act 22 of 2009).

2. All the writ petitioners are self financing schools and not getting any financial aid from the Government or other Government sources. Some of the writ petitioners are recognised under Tamil Nadu Private Schools Regulation Act; few others are recognised under Code of Regulations for Matriculation Schools or Code of Regulations for Anglo Indian Schools. In so far as Schools recognised under CBSE Regulations or ICSE regulations, the applicability of Tamilnadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act, 2009 is under challenge and those writ petitions challenging the applicability of the Act were ordered to be segregated. Since common points for determination arise in all these writ petitions, all of them were heard together and shall stand disposed of by this common judgment.

3. Background facts:- Till 20



























































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top