M.VENUGOPAL
Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
Munusamy – Respondent
The Petitioners/Defendants 2 & 3 have filed the present Civil Revision Petition as against the order in I.A.No.337 of 2009 in O.S.No.39 of 2003 dated 14.09.2009 passed by the Learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthiramerur.
2. The Learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthiramerur, while passing orders in I.A.No.337 of 2009 (filed by the Revision Petitioners/Defendants 2 & 3), has, among other things, observed that 'the present application has been filed only with a view to protract the pending case and further, the averments made in the application have already been made in the additional written statement filed by the Petitioners/Defendants 2 & 3 as early as on 19.08.2008. Once again very same averments have been mentioned and the present I.A.No.337 of 2009 has been filed. Further, the evidence of Plaintiff and Defendants are over and the case has been posted for hearing of the arguments. In this circumstance, the application has been filed belatedly etc.' and consequently, dismissed the application without costs.
3. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Defendants 2 & 3 submits that the trial Court has not appreciated of the fact that the le
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.