S.TAMILVANAN
R. Lazarus – Appellant
Versus
Ann Duraisamy, Rep. by her Power of Attorney Agent S. Ashok – Respondent
This revision has been preferred by the petitioner/tenant under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, challenging the order dated 10.11.2009 made in M.P.No.459 of 2009 in R.C.A.No.61 of 2004 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
2. It is a glaring example for the abuse of process of law and court by the revision petitioner/tenant, who has not paid the admitted rent for more than fourteen years, in spite of the concurrent findings of the learned Rent Controller in R.C.O.P.No.669 of 2001 and the Rent Control Appellate Authority, by order dated 10.11.2009 passed in M.P.No.459 of 2009 in R.C.A.No.61 of 2004 and also the conditional order dated 31.08.2012, passed by this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2009 in this Civil Revision Petition.
3. Mrs.Padmini Lazarus, learned counsel for the petitioner is admittedly the wife of the petitioner, R.Lazarus, who is said to be an Assistant Commissioner of Customs as stated by him in M.P.No.1 of 2009. Mrs.Padmini Lazarus, who was examined as R.W.2 on 09.12.2003 in the R.C.O.P, has admitted in her cross-examination, that her husband the petitioner herein i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.