M.JAICHANDREN, S.NAGAMUTHU
M. Dhavamani Christober – Appellant
Versus
S. David Amirtha Rajan – Respondent
M. Jaichandren, J.
1. Since the issues involved in all the above writ appeals are similar in nature, they have been taken up together and a common Judgment is being passed.
2. The writ appeals, in W.A.(MD) No.965 of 2012, W.A.(MD) No.966 of 2012 and W.A. (MD) No.989 of 2012, have been filed before this Court challenging the common order, dated 15.10.2012, made in W.P.(MD) Nos.2556 and 9361 of 2012, on various grounds, as mentioned therein.
3. Insofar as the writ appeals, in W.A.(MD) No.965 of 2012 and W.A.(MD) No.966 of 2012, are concerned, the appellant was the eighth respondent, in W.P.(MD) No.2556 of 2012 and he was the fifth respondent, in W.P.(MD) No.9361 of 2012. Insofar as the writ appeal, in W.A.(MD) No.989 of 2012, is concerned, the first appellant in the writ appeal is the Bishop - President, the Governing Council of the American college, Madurai, and the second appellant in the said writ appeal is the Governing Council of the American college, Madurai, who were the seventh and the fifth respondents, respectively, in W.P.No.2556 of 2012.
4. The writ petition, in W.P.(MD) No.2556 of 2012, had been filed by Dr. S. David Amirtha Rajan, (hereinafter referred to a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.