SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 1767

VINOD K.SHARMA
. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Judgment :-

Vinod K. Sharma, J.

O.A. No.116 of 2013:

This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with section 9(ii)(d)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, has been filed for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their agents, servants, collaborators, partners, associates or agreement holders wherever they be located or based other than the applicant from assembling, manufacturing, importing, marketing, selling or in any manner dealing with Wind Turbines/Wind Turbine Generators or its components/sub assembles and parts within the territory of India other than through the applicant pending arbitration proceedings.

O.A.No.117 of 2013:

This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with section 9(ii)(d)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, has been filed for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their agents, servants, collaborators, partners, associates or agreement holders from violating the Collaboration agreement signed between the applicant and the respondent on 21.2.2012 by applying for or securing a C-WET license.

2 In support of these applications, it is pleaded that M/s.Vyuvidyut Projects Private L














































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top