VINOD K.SHARMA
. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
Vinod K. Sharma, J.
O.A. No.116 of 2013:
This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with section 9(ii)(d)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, has been filed for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their agents, servants, collaborators, partners, associates or agreement holders wherever they be located or based other than the applicant from assembling, manufacturing, importing, marketing, selling or in any manner dealing with Wind Turbines/Wind Turbine Generators or its components/sub assembles and parts within the territory of India other than through the applicant pending arbitration proceedings.
O.A.No.117 of 2013:
This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with section 9(ii)(d)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, has been filed for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their agents, servants, collaborators, partners, associates or agreement holders from violating the Collaboration agreement signed between the applicant and the respondent on 21.2.2012 by applying for or securing a C-WET license.
2 In support of these applications, it is pleaded that M/s.Vyuvidyut Projects Private L
Mehul Mahendra Thakkar @ Karia v. Meena Mehul Thakkar @ Karia (2009)14 SCC 48)
Arlapati Ramanaiah Naidu and G.Lalithamma vs. L & T Finance Ltd. (2012(5) CTC 172)
Sadanandan Bhadran v. Madhavan Sunil Kumar (1998 (6) SCC 514)
Dorab Cawasji Warden v. Coomi Sorab Warden (1990)2 SCC 117
Bank of India v. K.Mohandas (2009)5 SCC 313)
South East Asia Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Nav Bharat Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and others. (1996 (3) SCC 443)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.