M.JAICHANDREN, M.VENUGOPAL
Madras Race Club rep. by its Secretary – Appellant
Versus
M. Victor – Respondent
M. Jaichandren, J.
1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned.
2. This original side appeal has been filed against the order passed by the learned single Judge, dated 23.10.2013, in Application No.1207 of 2013, in C.S.No.72 of 2013. The appellant herein had filed the said application praying for the rejection of the plaint filed in C.S.No.72 of 2013, under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
3. The learned single Judge had dismissed the application filed by the appellant herein, by his order, dated 23.10.2013, stating that the appellant had not made out a case for the rejection of the plaint, under Order VII Rule 11 clause (b), where the relief claimed is under valued and under clause (d), where the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law.
4. Mr. R. Viduthalai, the learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, had submitted that the application in Application No.1207 of 2013, had been filed, under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, for the rejection of the plaint filed in the suit, in C.S.No.72 of 2013, stating that the plaintiffs in the said suit had made an indirect cl
T.ARIVANDANDAM Vs. T.V.SATYAPAL (1977 4 SCC 467)
SOPAN SUKHDEO SABLE Vs. ASSTT. CHARITY COMMR.
SALEEM BHAI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (2003 (1) SCC 557)
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & ors. vs. Mohar Singh [(2008) 5 SCC 542]
NEELAVATHI Vs. N.NATARAJAN (AIR 1980 SC 691)
N.RAVINDRAN Vs. V.RAMACHANDRAN (2011 (3) CTC 153)
PEARLITE LINERS (P) LTD. Vs. MANORAMA SIRSI (2004 (3) SCC 172)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.