V.M.VELUMANI
Bhatharnisha Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Chellaammal – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 10.03.2011, passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Tenkasi, in I.A.No.100 of 2011 in O.S.No.15 of 1998.
2. The petitioner is the second defendant, whereas the respondent is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.15 of 1998 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.
3. The respondent filed the suit in O.S.No.15 of 1998 against one Resavu Mohammed and the petitioner herein, seeking for the relief of declaration that the second and third schedule property belongs to the plaintiff by way of prescription and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's enjoyment of pathway and for mandatory injunction against the petitioner to remove the wall and latrine mentioned as suit third schedule property.
4. According to the petitioner on receipt of suit summons, the petitioner and the said Resavu Mohammed entered appearance through counsel. A compromise was arrived at between the petitioner, the respondent and the said Resavu Mohammed in the presence of Panchayathars. On such compromise, the respondent agreed to withdraw the su
M/s. T.V.Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. Versus S.Raghunathan [2008 (1) LW 494]
N.Balakrishnan Versus M.Krishnamurthy
Maniben Devraj Shah Versus Municipal Corporation of Brihan
Ram Nath Sao v. Gobardhan Sao [2002 (3) SCC 195]
Shakuntala Devi Jain v. Kuntal Kumari [AIR 1969 SC 575 : 1969 (1) SCR 1006
State of W.B. v. Administrator
A.Muthusamy v. Muniammal and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.