R.KARUPPIAH
C. Varahaswamy Chetty – Appellant
Versus
K. M. S. Abdul Kani – Respondent
1. The deceased first revision petitioner alone filed this revision petition against the judgment and decree passed in RCA No.1 of 2002 wherein set aside the order and decreetal order passed in RCOP No.1/1998. During the pendancy of this revision petition, the sole revision petitioner died and the revision petitioners 2 and 3 are impleaded as Legal Representatives of the deceased revision petitioner.
2. The deceased first revision petitioner / landlord filed an eviction petition in RCOP.No.1 of 1998 under Section 10(3) (a) (1) and 10(3)(a)(iii) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, to vacate the respondent / tenant from the petition premises and deliver the same to the deceased revision petitioner. Brief facts stated in the petition are that the deceased revision petitioner was the owner of the petition premises and the respondent is a tenant under the deceased revision petitioner from 01.05.1995 to 30.04.1998. Since the schedule mentioned building required for running his business, the revision petitioner demanded the respondent to vacate the premises after expiry of a lease period, but, the respondent was evaded and also he filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.