K.KALYANASUNDARAM
P. K. Prakashan – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Soman – Respondent
1. These revisions arises out of the orders passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (II Additional District Judge, Puducherry), Mahe Camp in RCA Nos. 23 & 24 of 2011 confirming the eviction orders passed by the Rent Controller in HRCOP Nos. 6 & 7 of 2010.
2. The petitioners in these revisions are unsuccessful tenants before the Rent Control Authorities. The respondents as landlords initiated eviction proceeding against the petitioners in HRCOP Nos. 6 & 7 of 2010 under Section 10(3)(e) of the Pondicherry Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1969, seeking eviction on the ground of own use and occupation. It is averred by the landlords that the tenants have been inducted in the petition premises on monthly rent of Rs. 1200/- and the premises are used for non-residential purpose. The landlords issued notice on 25.03.2008 requesting the tenants to surrender vacant possession of the petition premises for their own use and occupation but the tenants sent a reply on 03.05.2008 with false allegations.
3. The respondents have stated in the petition that the first son of the second respondent herein was a B. Tech. Student and he has completed his course and is now unemployed; tha
Nilgais Co operative Marketing Society Vs. Uthandi
Annakili Ammal Vs. H.C. Hussain and Hassan
R. Krishnaswamy Vs. N. Arumugham
M. Nemichand Jain Vs. P. Ethirajan
G.R. Raghupathy Vs. Dr. K. Sankar
Ram Narain Arora Vs. Asha Rani and Others
T. Sivakumar Vs. K. Prabhakaran
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.