V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
N. Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, rep. by its Secretary, Government – Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian, J.
1. The writ appeals arise out of the dismissal of a batch of writ petitions challenging the method of fixation of seniority among directly recruited Assistant Engineers in the Highways Department, on the ground of delay and laches.
2. We have heard Mr. N.R. Chandran and Mr. R. Muthukumarasamy, learned Senior Counsel and Mr. N. Subramaniyan, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr. S. Gomathinayagam, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr. R. Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleader for the State, Miss.C.N.G.Niraimathi, learned counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Mr. K. Venkataramani and Mr. Vijay Narayan, learned Senior Counsel and Mr. N.G.R. Prasad, learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondents.
3. On 10.07.1999, a Notification for direct recruitment Assistant Engineers in the Public Works Department and Highways Department, was issued by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission.
4. After a process of selection, comprising of a written examination and oral interview, the Service Comm
P.S.Ghalaut Vs. State of Haryana
Bimlesh Tanwar Vs. State of Haryana
Mervyn Continho v. Collector of Customs
P.S. Ghalaut Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
Union of India Vs. Virpal Singh
Ajit Singh Januja Vs. State of Punjab
Bimlesh Tanwar Vs. State of Haryana
Ajit Singh & Ors. (II) Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.
P.V.George Vs. State of Kerala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.