R.MAHADEVAN
M. Pandia Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Sivakamasundari – Respondent
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
1. This Second Appeal has been filed by the Defendants 4 to 6/Appellants herein, who lost their case before both the courts below, against the judgment and decree, dated 17.12.2003, made in AS.Nos.24 and 30/2003, by the learned Principal District Judge, Thiruvallur, confirming the Judgment and decree, dated 11.10.2002, made in OS.No.188/1994, by the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruvallur. For the sake of convenience and for easy reference, the parties are hitherto described as they were arrayed before the Trial Court.
2. The case of the Plaintiff/1st Respondent herein, as set out in the Plaint, is as follows:-
a. The suit properties belonged to the 1st Defendant, who entered into an agreement of sale with the Plaintiff on 24.2.1987 and the Plaintiff has paid a sum of Rs.1,60,000/- towards the entire sale consideration. Since the Plaintiff has paid the entire sale consideration, time was not treated as the essence of the contract. At that time, the 1st Defendant was under the care and custody of the Plaintiff. The 1st Defendant had decided to construct a Temple at Manavala Nagar and the said ambition was carried out by the Plaintiff by giving her own funds and
Perumal vs. V. Balasubramanian
Hamda Ammal vs. Avadiappa Pathar and others
A. Jithendernath vs. Jubilee Hills Coop. House Building Society and another
Boramma vs. Kishna Gowda and others
Ittianam and others vs. Cherichi alias Padmini
Kaliyaperumal Nadar vs. Santhanam Chettiar and another
Thiruvengadam Pillai vs. Navaneethammal and another
Har Narain (Dead) by LRs. vs. Mam Chand (Dead) by LRs. and others
Guruswamy Nadar vs. P. Lakshmi Ammal (Dead) and others
Venkatramana Redddi vs. Rangiah Chetti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.