R.MALA
M. Kanagaraj – Appellant
Versus
M. Siriram – Respondent
The defendants, who lost the legal battle in both the Court below has filed the second appeal to set aside the judgment and decree dated 14.10.2005 passed in A.S.No.162 of 2005 on the file of the 2nd Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli confirming the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2005 passed in O.S.No.666 of 2004 on the file of the 1st Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
2. The respondent as plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and injunction stating that the 1st plaint schedule property is originally belonged to one V.M.Mohamed Mohideen Sahim. Later, it was sold to the father of the plaintiff viz., Muthaiah Mudhaliar under a registered sale deed dated 07.09.1952. He gifted the same to the plaintiff through the registered settlement deed dated 17.11.1983. The second schedule property is originally belonged to one M.P.M.Mohamed Yusuf Rowther and the same has been sold to the father of the plaintiff through a sale deed dated 13.04.1953 and subsequently, it was given to the plaintiff vide settlement deed on 18.11.1983. The plaintiff was in possession of the property and he paid kist in the name of his father. The defendants have no right, title or possess
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.