S.VAIDYANATHAN
B. Subramaniyan – Appellant
Versus
Syndicate of Annamalai University – Respondent
S. Vaidyanathan, J.
The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the University Order No.964/2014 (C) dated 19.11.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent based on the Resolution No.73 dated 07.11.2014 by the 1st respondent, cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as the Assistant Professor in History in the University by the appointment order No.678/2008(C) dated 11.11.2008 without conducting any enquiry and even before the cancellation of his SSLC certificate by the 3rd respondent and also for a consequential direction to the respondents 1 & 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service with effect from 19.11.2014 with back wages continuity of service and grant all other attended benefits.
2. When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 19.12.2014, this Court was pleased to pass an interim order, which reads as follows:
"It appears that no enquiry has been conducted against the petitioner. Therefore, sending him unceremoniously, without holding enquiry and without giving him any opportunity whatsoever, prima facie may not suit in line with equality clause under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the petitioner should be allowed to continue unt
Gayatrilaxmi Bapurao Nagpure v. State of Maharashtra and others
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and others
Rajendra Singh v. State of M. P. 1996 (5) SCC 460
Ram Chandra Singh v. Savitri Devi and Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Ravi Prakash Babulasing Parmar & Anr.
State Bank of Patiala v. S. K. Sharma 1996 (3) SCC 364
S.L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan and others
State of U.P. and others v. Saroj Kumar Sinha
State of Punjab v. Bhagat Ram (1975) 1 SCC 155
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.