P.DEVADASS
Sagayam @ Devasagayam – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police – Respondent
This petition has been filed by the petitioner to modify certain portion of the bail condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.2891 of 2017 on 21.02.2017.
2. In the order stated supra, while granting him anticipatory bail, among other conditions, this Court has imposed the following conditions:-
''6(iv) Petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two sureties who shall be blood related, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate.''
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, requires production of property documents for the value of Rs.15,000/-. He submits that the sureties have no property. In the circumstances, the petitioner is not in a position to execute the bail bond. Thus, he seeks modification.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that persons who were granted bail, anticipatory bail, even statutory default bail are not in a position to execute the bail bond and the sureties are also not in a position to execute the surety bonds, because of certain practices being followed by the Courts. The learned counsel also added that
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another
Bhikhabhai Udesinh Darbar vs. State of Gujarat
Babu Singh and Others vs. The State of U.P.
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Moti Ram and Others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ramathal and Others vs. Inspector of Police and Another
Sandeep Jain vs. National Capital Territory of Delhi
Sheikh Ayub vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.