SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 2962

G.R.SWAMINATHAN
M. Gnanasekaran – Appellant
Versus
Mothi Periyakaruppan @ M. Maharajan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R. Suriya Narayanan
For the Respondents: V. Meenakshi Sundaram

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard the learned counsel for both parties.

2. The first respondent herein filed O.S.No.11 of 2014 on the file of V Additional District Judge, Madurai seeking the relief of partition in respect of A, B and C schedule properties and for declaration that he is the Trustee of the suit Trust by enjoying the D schedule properties. The plaintiff as well as the defendants are sons of late Mothi Ayyan Ambalam, who passed away on 02.11.2013. The second defendant who is the appellant herein filed his written statement contending that a suit for partition will not lie in view of execution of a registered Will dated 02.03.2007 in his favour by Mothi Ayyan Ambalam. After the plaintiff examined himself and another witness on his side and closed his evidence, the appellant as the propounder of the Will dated 02.03.2007 examined himself and two of the attestors. When the matter was posted for arguments, the plaintiff filed I.A.Nos.729 to 731 of 2016 for re-opening the case for further evidence, for recall of P.W.1 and for reception of additional documents. The learned trial Judge allowed I.A.No.729 of 2016 in O.S.No.11 of 2014 on 16.12.2016. However, in paragraph No.14 of the said orde









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top