S.VAIDYANATHAN
Krishna Kumar Sood – Appellant
Versus
Srinath Rajam, Director & Authorised Signatory, Sunco Machines Ltd. – Respondent
1. This Crl.M.P. is filed to make an inquiry in the interest of justice, into the matter of deceptive introduction of a forged document, i.e. lease deed mentioned as Item No.1 in the typed set of papers, to get a favourable order in Crl.O.P.No.5078 of 2010, call for the original records of C.C.No.439 of 2008 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur and record a finding and direct any officer of the Court as this Court deems fit and proper to prefer a complaint before any competent authority or Court for the offences under Sections 191, 192, 193, 196, 199, 200, 463, 464, 465, 469, 470 and 471 IPC, as contemplated under Section 340 Cr.P.C.
2. The case of the petitioner is that there was a private complaint against the respondent-Srinath Rajam for various offences under Sections 406, 409 and 420 IPC filed on 03.11.2008 for having collected a sum of Rs.71 lakhs from sub-tenants and misappropriating the said amount. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur took cognizance of the complaint and having satisfied that prima-face case is made out, assigned n
Dr.Vijay Kumar Kathuria and another Vs. State of Haryana and others
Herrington Vs. British Railways Board
Iqbal Singh Marwah Vs. Meenakshi Marwah
Kushalbha Ratanbhai Rohit and others Vs. State of Gujarat
Padma Sundara Rao Vs. State of T.N.
S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath
State, rep. by DSP, SBCID, Chennai Vs. K.V.Rajendrdan and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.