SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 3488

S.VAIDYANATHAN
Krishna Kumar Sood – Appellant
Versus
Srinath Rajam, Director & Authorised Signatory, Sunco Machines Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:A.V. Somasundaram for M/s. K. Shanker, Advocates
For the Respondent:Karthick, Senior Counsel for M/s. John Samuvel, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. This Crl.M.P. is filed to make an inquiry in the interest of justice, into the matter of deceptive introduction of a forged document, i.e. lease deed mentioned as Item No.1 in the typed set of papers, to get a favourable order in Crl.O.P.No.5078 of 2010, call for the original records of C.C.No.439 of 2008 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur and record a finding and direct any officer of the Court as this Court deems fit and proper to prefer a complaint before any competent authority or Court for the offences under Sections 191, 192, 193, 196, 199, 200, 463, 464, 465, 469, 470 and 471 IPC, as contemplated under Section 340 Cr.P.C.

2. The case of the petitioner is that there was a private complaint against the respondent-Srinath Rajam for various offences under Sections 406, 409 and 420 IPC filed on 03.11.2008 for having collected a sum of Rs.71 lakhs from sub-tenants and misappropriating the said amount. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur took cognizance of the complaint and having satisfied that prima-face case is made out, assigned n

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top