G. Chockalingam, J.

1. This revision is directed against the order passed in Crl. M.P. No. 1267 of 2014 in C.C. No. 163 of 1996, dated 18.05.2015 by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (EOI), Egmore, Chennai, refusing to discharge the petitioner from the case.

2. The facts leading to the case are as follows:-

The respondent/complainant preferred a complaint under Sections 8(1), 9(1)(c) and 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, punishable under Section 56(1)(i) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (EOI), Egmore, Chennai stating that the accused company, who were telecasting under logo J.J. TV had hired transponder abroad for their telecast and payments made abroad for the same without getting permission of the RBI and during search, certain incriminating documents were recovered and after examination of the witnesses, charges were framed against the accused and the present petitioner/A3 filed a petition under Section 245(1) Cr.P.C. to discharge her from the case. After hearing both sides and considering the entire evidence available on record, the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (E