M. Sundar, J.

I propose to dispose of all the eight applications by this common order.

2. There are two suits. The sole plaintiff in both the suits is one and the same and it is a private limited company. The sole defendant in each of the suits is different and they are also private limited companies. Both the suits pertain to two separate agreements of sale, both dated 27.07.2005, under which each of the defendant companies agreed to sell to the plaintiff company adjacent properties. Plaintiff company in both the suits is the applicant in six applications. Each of the defendant companies is applicant in two of the above said applications, they being reject the plaint applications in the respective suits. Though the defendant company in the two suits are different, as the facts are identical and as I propose to dispose of all these applications by a common order, the term ‘defendant companies-is used in this order to collectively denote the two companies which have been arrayed as sole defendant in the two suits. With regard to other aspects, the parties in these applications are referred to by their respective ranks in the main suit, for the sake of brevity, convenience and c