SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 877

M.SUNDAR
Chinnan – Appellant
Versus
Sangan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :S. Ramesh, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S. Natarajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This litigation commenced more than two decades ago, to be precise on 06.08.1996 when one Chinnan along with his son and three daughters launched a suit against one Sangan (since deceased) regarding a vacant site admeasuring 2160 square feet or thereabouts.

2. A thumbnail sketch of facts absolutely essential for appreciating this judgment is set out infra under the caption 'Factual matrix in a nutshell'. To be noted, 'Factual matrix in a nutshell' contains only facts which are imperative for understanding and appreciating this judgment sans other particulars and details.

3. Facts in a Nutshell :

3(a) Suit property is a vacant site admeasuring 2160 square feet or thereabouts. This Second Appeal arises out of a suit being No.306 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif Court, Aruppukkottai and the said court shall hereinafter be referred to as 'trial court' for the sake of convenience and clarity. From the description in the decree of the trial court, it can be culled out that the suit property is a rectangular piece of vacant site admeasuring 20 yards lengthwise (North










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top