SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 20

C. A. VAIDIALINGAM, J. M. SHELAT
Ram Gobinda Dawan – Appellant
Versus
Bhaktabala: Sunil Kumar Roy – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.MUKHERJI

Judgment

VAIDIALINGAM J.: - These two appeals on certificate are directed against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated March 27, 1962 in First Appeals from the Original Decree Nos. 311 and 312 of 1956.

2. Two plots of land bearing No. 936 of Mouza Asansol and plot No. 9202 of Mouza Asansol Municipality were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act dated December 13, 1947 was published in the Calcutta Gazette of 25th December, 1947. The declaration under Section 6 dated December 30, 1947 was published in the Calcutta Gazette on 8th January, 1948. For plot No 936 of Mouza Asansol measuring about 31 acres, the Land Acquisition Collector awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1707/- including Rs. 13/1/6 on account of the landlord s interest. The entire compensation in respect of this plot was directed to be paid to Bhaktbala Dasi, the sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 436 of 1967. In-respect of plot No. 9202 of Mouza Asansol Municipality, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded as compensation a sum of Rs. 825/15/6 including Rs. 6/5/6 on account of the landlord s interest. This entire amount of compensation was directed to



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top