S.VAIDYANATHAN
Mahesh Bharathan – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
The Petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the Respondents to return the Schedule Mentioned Shares to him.
2. According to the Petitioner, who is the Proprietor of M/s. C.R. Bharathan & Co., he availed Overdraft facilities from the Respondent/Bank in the year 1996 for the purpose of business operations of the Proprietary concern and for the facility availed by him, he had executed necessary documents as security and by Letters dated 28.06.1998 and 12.02.1999, he had pledged several collateral securities with the Respondent/Bank, including 200 shares of Reliance Industries. The Respondent/Bank has accepted and acknowledged the same.
3. While so, as a result of Stock scam in the year 2000, the Petitioner suffered huge loss in the business and he was unable to clear the outstanding dues on the said account. Consequently, the Respondent/Bank initiated recovery proceedings in O.A.No.2410 of 2001 under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (in short 'RDDB & FI Act) before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, for a total sum of Rs.96,33,180.63 with future interest @ 17% per annum. The Debts Recovery Tribuna
Babulal Badriprasad Verma vs. Surat Municipal Corporation and others
Krishna Bahadur vs. Purna Theater
Prabhat Bank Ltd. vs. Babu Ram
Srinivasulu Naidu (died) and others vs. Gajaraj Mehta and Sons
Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited vs. Millenium Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India vs. Devi Ispat Limited and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.