IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.N. PRAKASH, C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, JJ.
State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police Namakkal - Appellant
Versus
Kamaraj - Respondent
Referred Trial No.2 of 2017 and Criminal Appeal Nos.402 and 465 of 2017
Decided on : 25-10-2017
Indian Penal Code,1860 - 449,392 r/w 397, 302, 457 , 392 , 34 and 380 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - 211(7) , 236, 43 and 235 - Evidence Act - Section 10 – Offence of murder - House trespass - Charges – Challenged - Case of triple murder for gain - (P.W.1) and her husband (P.W.4) are owners of Annai Eye Hospital and Annai Opticals in Fort Road - (P.W.4) is an Ophthalmologist by profession and his wife (P.W.1) manages the hospital - Couple live in ground floor of the hospital and they have no children - Couple own an independent bungalow a kilometre away - Immediately, (P.W.2) and his wife went to next door to see what had happened and at that time (P.W.1) and her husband D (P.W.4) were entering into the house - (P.W.1) was shocked to see her mother (D1) beneath staircase, lying in a pool of blood, with cut injuries in her neck and with a lungi tied around her neck - Thereafter, she saw her niece (D2) in dining hall, lying in a pool of blood with cut injuries in her neck, with her hands and legs tied - Held, This would give her confidence in life and by that time, if (A2) and (A3) are released, she would be at peace with herself and would have a future to look forward to with her own independent family - Reports of Central Prison, Trichy and Central Prison, Coimbatore reinforce our conviction that death sentence may not be appropriate answer and rather, life sentence for thirty years without any possibility of any remission or coming out of jail for any reason whatsoever, could be a more appropriate answer with respect to sentence imposed - However, sentence of ten years Rigorous Imprisonment for offence under Section 392 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and life imprisonments shall run consecutively - In other words, (A3) shall first undergo Rigorous Imprisonment of ten years for offence under Section 392 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and thereafter, undergo life imprisonments concurrently - Imprisonment without any statutory remission or commutation - In the result, with above modification in sentence, criminal appeals are dismissed.
P.N. PRAKASH, C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, JJ.
1. The reference in R.T. No.2 of 2017 has been made by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Namakkal, under Section 366 Cr.P.C., seeking confirmation of the capital punishment imposed upon Kamaraj (A2) and Elangovan (A3) vide judgment dated 02.06.2017 in S.C. No. 94 of 2012. Kamaraj (A2) and Elangovan (A3) have independently preferred Criminal Appeal Nos.465 of 2017 and 402 of 2017 respectively, challenging their convictions and sentences.
2. The case of the prosecution, culled out from the materials on record, is as follows:
2.1 This is a case of triple murder for gain. Umadevi (P.W.1) and her husband Dr. Sundaram (P.W.4) are the owners of Annai Eye Hospital and Annai Opticals in Fort Road, Namakkal. Dr.Sundaram (P.W.4) is an Ophthalmologist by profession and his wife Umadevi (P.W.1) manages the hospital. The couple live in the ground floor of the hospital and they have no children. The couple own an independent bungalow a kilometre away in Mullai Nagar. The father of Umadevi (P.W.1) died sometime in 1977 leaving behind his wife Visalakshi (D1), one son by name Sivagurunathan and three daughters, viz., Sathyavathi (D3), Parvathy (P.W.7) and Umadevi (P.W.1). Sathyavathi (D3) was married to Dr. Thirumalaiswamy (P.W.8), an E.N.T. specialist and through the said wedlock, she begot a daughter Sindhu (D2), who also became a medical professional. As Sathyavathi (D3) got estranged from her husband Dr.Thirumalaiswamy (P.W.8), she started living separately with her daughter Dr. Sindhu (D2). Dr. Sindhu (D2) was married to Dr.Balasubramaniam (P.W.9), an Orthopaedic Surgeon and they have a daughter named Abinandhini, aged about 6 years.
2.2 It appears that the sisters, viz., Sathyavathi (D3), Umadevi (P.W.1) and Parvathi (P.W.7) were very close and since Umadevi (P.W.1) was issueless, she was very fond of the daughter of her sister Sathyavathi (D3), viz., Dr. Sindhu (D2) and they treated Dr. Sindhu (D2) as their own child. Since Sathyavathi (D3) was estranged from her husband, the family decided to house Visalakshi (D1) and Sathyavathi (D3) in the house of Umadevi (P.W.1) at Mullai Nagar. Since Dr. Sindhu (D2) was in active practice, she left her child Abinandhini in the care and custody of her mother Sathyavathi (D3) and grandmother Visalakshi (D1) in their Mullai Nagar residence.
2.3 Ten days prior to the incident, Dr. Sindhu (D2) came to the Mullai Nagar residence to be with her mother Sathyavathi (D3) and daughter Abinandhini. A gruesome tragedy struck the family on 13.10.2011 between 3.15 p.m and 3.30 p.m., when two persons entered into the house. Those two persons, after tying up the inmates, slit the neck of Visalakshi (D1), Dr. Sindhu (D2) and Sathyavathi (D3) and left with a huge haul of gold jewellery from them. There was a little life left in Sathyavathi (D3) and so, she managed to come out of the house and entered the house of her neighbour Sampathkumar (P.W.2). Sampathkumar (P.W.2) and his wife were aghast on seeing Sathyavathi (D3) bleeding all over and unable to speak, as she was having cut injuries on her neck and left wrist. Sathyavathi (D3) wanted to write something and so, Sampathkumar (P.W.2) gave her a scrap of paper, on which, Sathyavathi (D3) wrote in Tamil as follows:
“Any Other Language”
She left her blood stains on the paper.
2.4 Immediately, Sampathkumar (P.W.2) and his wife went to the next door to see what had happened and at that time, Umadevi (P.W.1) and her husband Dr. Sundaram (P.W.4) were entering into the house. Umadevi (P.W.1) was shocked to see her mother Visalakshi (D1) beneath the staircase, lying in a pool of blood, with cut injuries in her neck and with a lungi tied around her neck. Thereafter, she saw her niece Dr. Sindhu (D2) in the dining hall, lying in a pool of blood, with cut injuries in her neck, with her hands and legs tied. This gha
Govinda Reddy and another v. State of Mysore AIR 1960 SC 29
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Gangula Satya Murthy (1997) 1 SCC 272
Kehar Singh and others vs. State (Delhi Administration)
State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru
Bachan Singh Vs State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684
Ramnaresh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2012) 4 SCC 257
Deepak Rai Vs State of Bihar (2013) 10 SCC 421
Gurudev Singh vs. State of Punjab 2003 (7) SCC 258
Shankar Kisanrao Khade vs. State of Maharashtra (2013) 5 SCC 546
Aghnoo Nagesia vs. State of Bihar
Pullurkuri Kotayya vs. King Emperor AIR 1947 PC 67
Himachal Pradesh Administration vs. Om Prakash (1972) 1 SCC 249
Mehboob Ali v State of Rajasthan (2016) 14 SCC 640
Haru Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal (2009) 15 SCC 551
Swami Shradhanand @ Murali Manohar Mishra Vs. State of Karnataka (2008) 13 SCC 767
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.