SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 1799

G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Hemanakumar – Appellant
Versus
D. Melvinkumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram for Mr.D.Nallathambi
For the Respondents: Mr.H.Arumugam.

ORDER :

1. The plaintiff in O.S No.593 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District is the revision petitioner herein. The suit was filed for the relief of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the first defendant and his men and agents from disturbing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment over the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff filed I.A No.513 of 2015 for amending the plaint. In the affidavit filed in support of I.A No.513 of 2015, the plaintiff submitted that he filed the injunction suit on the strength of a settlement deed No.1812 of 2008, dated 08.05.2008, executed by the second defendant in his favour and that he has come to know that the said settlement deed has been cancelled. Since certain subsequent documents have been executed, the plaintiff thought it necessary to seek three additional declaratory reliefs. In particular, he wanted declaration of his right to title, possession and enjoyment over the suit property as per the settlement deed dated 08.05.2008. He also contended that the cancellation deed dated 04.06.2008 would not bind him. The third declaratory relief that was sought was that the sal



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top