T.RAVINDRAN
P. K. Rangayyan – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Chinnasami – Respondent
1. Challenge, in this second appeal, is made to the Judgment and Decree dated 28.06.2002 passed in A.S.No.31 of 2002 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Erode, at Bhavani, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 13.11.2000 passed in O.S.No.165 of 1997 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Bhavani.
2. The second appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:
“(a). Whether the lower Appellate Court is right in holding that Ex.A3 partition deed between the parties is sham and nominal, overlooking that admittedly Ex.A3 was entered into by the parties voluntarily, executed, got registered and acted upon by paying separate kists, transferring pattas and transferring the electricity service connections in their respective names?
(b). Whether the present suit for partition is maintainable without a prayer for setting aside the earlier partition under Ex.A3 entered into by the parties?”
3. Considering the scope of the issues involved in the matter between the parties as regards the subject matter lying in a narrow compass, it is found unnecessary to dwell into the facts of the case in detail.
4. The suit has been laid by the pl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.