SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3271

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
J. P. Verma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sivanandhan, Adv., K. Srinivasan, Adv.

JUDGMENT

A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

1. This Criminal Appeal is filed by the Appellant, who is the accused in CC.No.3 of 2007, against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 23.11.2011, made by the Principal Special Court for CBI Cases and VIII Additional City Special Court, Chennai, seeking the following reliefs:-

(a) To call for the records of the case in CC.No.3 of 2007, on the file of the Principal Special Court for CBI Cases and VIII Additional City Special Court, Chennai.

(b) To examine the legality, propriety and correctness of the proceedings and the impugned judgment.

(c) To set aside the order of conviction and direct acquittal of the Appellant.

(d) To grant such other equitable reliefs.

2. The Trial Court, in and by the impugned judgment, dated, 23.11.2011, had convicted and sentenced the Appellant, for the offences punishable under (a) Sections 120B of IPC, read with Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two months, (b) Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to undergo Rigorous Imp






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top