G.JAYACHANDRAN
Vai. Palanisamy, Tiruppur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Represented by The Secretary, Ministry of New & Renewable Energy, New Delhi – Respondent
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned paper publications in i). “The New Indian Express, Chennai Edition” dated: 20.04.2016, ii). “The Time of India, Chennai Edition” dated :06.05.2016 & iii). “The New Indian Express, Chennai Edition” dated:20.05.2016 of the 3rd & 11th respondents with respect to the Power Transmission Projects namely.
a. Raigarh to Pugalur 800 KV HVDC Line.
b. Pugalur to North Thrissur 400 KV (Quad) D/C Line.
c. Pugalur HVDC Station – Pugalur Existing 400 KV (Quad) D/C Line.
d. Pugalur HVDC Station – Arasur 400 KV (Quad) D/C Line.
e. Pugalur HVDC Station – Thiruvalam 400 KV (Quad) D/C Line.
f. Pugalur HVDC Station – Edayarpalayam 400 KV (Quad) D/C Line.
g. Edayarpalayam – Udumalapet 400 KV (Quad) D/C Line.
of the 3rd & 11th respondents and quash the same and subsequently direct the 3rd & 11th respondents to issue Fresh paper publications/Notifications with respect to the above Projects with detailed description of the Affected lands & a
Om Prakash Sharma & Ors Vs. M.P.Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam & Ors reported in 2005 10 SCC 306
M.C.Metha Vs. Kamal Nath reported in (1997) 1 SCC 388
Manohar Vs. State of Maharastra
Muthu Associates and another Vs. State of Maharastra reported in 2013 (14) SCC 304
A.K.Kraipak and others Vs. Union of India and others reported in 1969 (2) SCC 262
C.B.Gautham Vs. Union of India and others reported in 1993 (1) SCC 78
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.