N.ANAND VENKATESH
Mathew Samuel – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. Anand Venkatesh, J.
1. Mr. A. Natarajan, learned Public Prosecutor takes notice for the 1st respondent. Notice to the 2nd respondent returnable by four weeks. Private notice is also permitted.
2. This case raises a very important issue as to whether any words either spoken or written or by signs or by visible representation or otherwise, made against an individual person, whatever position he is holding and which does not result in promoting feelings of enmity or hatred between different groups on grounds of religion, race, language, etc., will come within the purview of Section 153A of IPC. This position must be clarified since it is noticed that in many cases which involves governmental authorities, particularly having political overtones and which at the best only affects the interest/reputation of the individuals concerned, and does not in fact cause any disharmony or promotes any hatred between religion, race, community etc., FIR is being registered for an offence u/s. 153A and 505 IPC.
3. In the present case the FIR has been registered by the respondent Police based on the Complaint given by the 2nd respondent who claims to be the Secretary of the IT Wing of the AIA
Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen
Bilal Ahmed Kaloo v. State of A.P.
Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab
Khilumal Topandas v. Arjundas Tulsidas
Maulana Azizul Haq Kausar Naqvi v. State
M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd., Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and Ors. Vs. Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.