SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Mad) 1644

N.ANAND VENKATESH
Thangamuthu – Appellant
Versus
A. Jeyaraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:H. Arumugam, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Mani, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.800 of 2011 in O.S.No. 228 of 2007, dated 28.10.2011, on the file of the II-Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, insofar as the liberty given to the respondent to mark the document after payment of stamp duty is concerned.)

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the fair and final order passed by the Court below giving liberty to the respondent to mark the document after paying sufficient stamp duty.

2. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit. The respondent filed a suit in O.S.No.228 of 2017 against the petitioners seeking for the relief of declaration and consequential permanent injunction.

3. After the completion of the pleadings, issues were framed and the case was at the stage of trial.

4. The respondent/plaintiff marked a sale deed, dated 14.02.1986, which was valued at Rs.2,000/- and which was an un-registered and insufficiently stamped document. This document was marked as Ex.A1. The petitioners filed an application in I.A.No. 800 of 2011, before the Court below to reject the said document. The Court below allowed the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top