P.T.ASHA
Muthulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Balaguru Pandiyan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2014 in A.S.No.29 of 2012 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.03.2011 in O.S.No.656 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Sub-Court, Dindigul.)
The defendants in a suit for specific performance are the appellants before this Court. The parties are referred to in the same status as in the trial Court.
2. The plaintiff's case:
(ii) It is the case of the plaintiff that the second defendant had executed a registered power of attorney in favour of the first defendant. The first defendant had offered to sell the suit property to the plaintiff for
K.R.Venugopal vs. K.R.Srinivasan and four others
Mehboob-ur-Rehman (Dead) through L.Rs. vs. Ahsanul Ghani
Mussaudddin Ahmed vs. State of Assam
N.P.Thirugnanam vs. Dr.R.Jahan Mohan Rao and Others
P.Sampoornam and others v. L.T.Somasundaram and others
Paramanand vs. Bajrang and Another
R.Gnana Arulmoni vs. R.S.Maharajan
S.Rangaraju Naidu v. Thiruvarakkarasu
Silvey and others vs. Arun Varghese and another
Subhra Mukherjee and another v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.