M.SATHYANARAYANAN, N.SESHASAYEE
Pandarinathan Govindarajulu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Another standoff between cause of environment and call of development. The challenge herein relates to the project of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) involving expansion of NH-45A that runs between Villupuram and Nagapattinam, for a distance of 179.555 kms. as part of its Bharatmala Pariyojana Project. No Environmental Impact Assessment (henceforth, EIA) study was undertaken to evaluate the environmental viability of the project, whereas, the Notification in S.O. 1533 issued by Ministry of Environment and Forest, dated 14.09.2006, under Rule 5 (3) of the Environment Protection Rules, 1986, and, as amended Vide notification in S.O. 2559 (E) issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, dated 22.08.2013, mandates EIA compliance for projects of laying new or expanding existing National Highways. The relevant item in the Notifications is reproduced here:
| Project or Activity | Category with threshold limit | Conditions if any | ||
| 7 | Physical Infrastructure including Environmental Services | |||
| 7(f) | Highways | (i) New National Highways. | (i) New St | |
Anil Hoble vs. Kashinath Jairam Shetye
Association for Environment Protection vs. State of Kerala
Deepak Kumar vs. State of Haryana
Hanuman Laxman Aroskar vs. Union of India
M.C. Mehta vs. Kamalnath and Others
M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India and Others
Puducherry Environment Protection Association vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.