N.SATHISH KUMAR
Vignesh Paramaguru – Appellant
Versus
Arulmigu Paripoorana Vinayagar Kovil – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. Sathish Kumar, J.
1. Aggrieved over the decree and the judgment of the trial Court decreeing the suit for recovery of possession, the present appeal is filed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts, leading to the filing of this Appeal Suit, are as follows:-
4. The first defendant admitting that his father was in
A.N. Ramaswami Iyer and others vs. The Commissioner [(1975) 2 MLJ 178]
Bishop of Thanjavur Diocese Secretary vs. Savari Nayagam and another [2014 0 Supreme (Mad) 1056]
Gurunatha Pandithan vs. The Commissioner [(1991) 2 MLJ 409]
Gurpur Guni Venkataraya Narashima Prabhu and others vs. B.C. Achia
Ishwardas vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal [AIR 1968 SC 1364]
Nagercoil Asarimar vs. Natarajan Asari and others [1973 (2) MLJ 306]
Sunil Kumar Roy vs. M/w. Bhowra Kankanee Collieries ltd. [AIR 1971 SC 751]
Selvaraj and others vs. Uthirapathy and others [2017 0 Supreme (Mad) 159]
The Assistant Commissioner vs. Nattamai K.S. Ellappa Mudaliar and others [1987 0 AIR (Mad) 187]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.