SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
Dr. S. Radhakrishnan - Appellant
Versus
The Registrar Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Arumbakkam, Chennai & Others - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 11983 of 2021 & WMP.No.12753 of 2021
Decided On : 19-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :N.R. Elango, Senior Advocate, S. Manuraj, Advocate.
For the Respondents:G. Sankaran, J. Ashok, Advocates.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Tamil Nadu Medical Council Code of Medical Ethics (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2003 - Regulation 8.1 and 8.4 - Indian Penal Code, 1950 - Section 468 - Forgery for purpose of cheating - Issuance of certificate - Fraudulent medical certificate - Removal of his name from medical register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council - Seeking direction to respondent to restore name of petitioner in Medical Register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council - Alleging that petitioner herein had issued a fraudulent medical certificate certifying medical condition of her father deceased According to third respondent, on basis of such certificate, he brother had prepared a requisition letter addressed to Sub-Registrar, and registered a settlement deed by which valuable properties of her father were transferred in his favour. According to petitioner, medical certificate issued by him had allegedly facilitated execution of settlement deed in favour of brother of third respondent by which a prime properties worth about 50 crores have been alienated fraudulently and therefore, she has given complaint against petitioner – Held, Primary duty of Tamil Nadu Medical Council is to govern, regulate and ensure the professional conduct and ethics to be adopted by registered medical practitioners. The medical practitioner has a primordial duty to repose trust and faith in patients and their relatives about their recovery and well being. Any disregard or violation of norms will have to be dealt with by Council, of course, after following the established procedures as contemplated under law. If any complaint is made, complaining that a medical practitioner had contravened norms, Rules and Regulations or there is abuse of position as a medical professional, such complaints will be dealt with in accordance with procedures as laid down under Regulations with object of ensuring proportionality, deterrence and rehabilitation by imposing proportionate punishment - Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records and quash the proceedings under Ref.No.TNMC/DC No.136/2018 dated 04.05.2021 before the first and second respondents and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to restore the name of the petitioner in the Medical Register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council.

The petitioner calls in question the order dated 04.05.2021 passed by the first respondent, in and by which, he was imposed with the punishment of removal of his name from the medical register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council for two years, with further direction that during such period of deletion of his name from the medical register, he is not entitled to practice Medicine.

2. The case projected in the writ petition is as follows:

    2.1 The petitioner completed his M.B.B.S. degree from Madras Medical College and also acquired A.S.T.S. Certified Clinical Fellowship in Transplant Surgery from United States of America. It is also stated that he is a member of F.R.C.S. Ireland, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland and F.R.C.S. England, Royal College of Surgeons of England. It is further stated that he is a registered Medical Practitioner with the Tamil Nadu Medical Council vide Registration No. 38590 in 1984. The petitioner claims to have performed several extensive surgeries including Kidney, Pancreas and small bowel transplantation; and he worked as a Consultant Surgeon in Sri Ramakrishna Hospital, Coimbatore and as Transplant Surgeon in Coimbatore Kidney Centre.

2.2 On 19.10.2018, the third respondent preferred a complaint to the Medical Council of India, alleging that the petitioner herein had issued a fraudulent medical certificate dated 08.10.2015 certifying the medical condition of her father deceased N. Pitchaimani as on 08.10.2015. According to the third respondent, on the basis of such certificate, her brother Mr. Sakthi Kumar had prepared a requisition letter addressed to the Sub-Registrar, Neelangarai and registered a settlement deed by which valuable properties of her father were transferred in his favour. According to the petitioner, the medical certificate dated 08.10.2015 issued by him had allegedly facilitated the execution of the settlement deed in favour of the brother of the third respondent by which a prime properties worth about 50 crores have been alienated fraudulently and therefore, she has given the complaint dated 19.10.2018 against the petitioner.

2.3 On receipt of the complaint dated 19.10.2018, sent through e-mail, the Medical Council of India forwarded it to the first respondent on 14.11.2018 with a request to initiate appropriate action under the provisions of The Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002.

2.4 Pursuant to the same, a disciplinary committee was constituted to conduct an enquiry against the petitioner and others. On the same set of facts, the third respondent also gave a complaint to the Central Crime Branch, Chennai, based on which, a case in Crime No. 374 of 2016 was registered. After investigation, a final report was filed on 25.06.2018 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur. To quash the same, the petitioner has filed Criminal Original Petition No. 29269 of 2019 before this Court and the same is pending.

2.5 In the meantime, on the basis of the complaint dated 19.10.2018, the first respondent issued a show cause notice dated 28.11.2018 calling upon the petitioner and others to submit their explanation. The petitioner submitted a reply on 11.01.2019 narrating the circumstances which led to the issuance of Medical Certificate. It is his explanation that the medical certificate has been issued with a bonafide intention by adhering to the norms. In his reply, the petitioner also referred to the delay in filing the complaint by the third respondent, three years after he issued a certificate and this delay, according to him, vitiates the entir

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top