IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
Dr. S. Radhakrishnan - Appellant
Versus
The Registrar Tamil Nadu Medical Council, Arumbakkam, Chennai & Others - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 11983 of 2021 & WMP.No.12753 of 2021
Decided On : 19-01-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Tamil Nadu Medical Council Code of Medical Ethics (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2003 - Regulation 8.1 and 8.4 - Indian Penal Code, 1950 - Section 468 - Forgery for purpose of cheating - Issuance of certificate - Fraudulent medical certificate - Removal of his name from medical register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council - Seeking direction to respondent to restore name of petitioner in Medical Register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council - Alleging that petitioner herein had issued a fraudulent medical certificate certifying medical condition of her father deceased According to third respondent, on basis of such certificate, he brother had prepared a requisition letter addressed to Sub-Registrar, and registered a settlement deed by which valuable properties of her father were transferred in his favour. According to petitioner, medical certificate issued by him had allegedly facilitated execution of settlement deed in favour of brother of third respondent by which a prime properties worth about 50 crores have been alienated fraudulently and therefore, she has given complaint against petitioner – Held, Primary duty of Tamil Nadu Medical Council is to govern, regulate and ensure the professional conduct and ethics to be adopted by registered medical practitioners. The medical practitioner has a primordial duty to repose trust and faith in patients and their relatives about their recovery and well being. Any disregard or violation of norms will have to be dealt with by Council, of course, after following the established procedures as contemplated under law. If any complaint is made, complaining that a medical practitioner had contravened norms, Rules and Regulations or there is abuse of position as a medical professional, such complaints will be dealt with in accordance with procedures as laid down under Regulations with object of ensuring proportionality, deterrence and rehabilitation by imposing proportionate punishment - Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records and quash the proceedings under Ref.No.TNMC/DC No.136/2018 dated 04.05.2021 before the first and second respondents and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to restore the name of the petitioner in the Medical Register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council.
The petitioner calls in question the order dated 04.05.2021 passed by the first respondent, in and by which, he was imposed with the punishment of removal of his name from the medical register of Tamil Nadu Medical Council for two years, with further direction that during such period of deletion of his name from the medical register, he is not entitled to practice Medicine.
2. The case projected in the writ petition is as follows:
2.2 On 19.10.2018, the third respondent preferred a complaint to the Medical Council of India, alleging that the petitioner herein had issued a fraudulent medical certificate dated 08.10.2015 certifying the medical condition of her father deceased N. Pitchaimani as on 08.10.2015. According to the third respondent, on the basis of such certificate, her brother Mr. Sakthi Kumar had prepared a requisition letter addressed to the Sub-Registrar, Neelangarai and registered a settlement deed by which valuable properties of her father were transferred in his favour. According to the petitioner, the medical certificate dated 08.10.2015 issued by him had allegedly facilitated the execution of the settlement deed in favour of the brother of the third respondent by which a prime properties worth about 50 crores have been alienated fraudulently and therefore, she has given the complaint dated 19.10.2018 against the petitioner.
2.3 On receipt of the complaint dated 19.10.2018, sent through e-mail, the Medical Council of India forwarded it to the first respondent on 14.11.2018 with a request to initiate appropriate action under the provisions of The Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002.
2.4 Pursuant to the same, a disciplinary committee was constituted to conduct an enquiry against the petitioner and others. On the same set of facts, the third respondent also gave a complaint to the Central Crime Branch, Chennai, based on which, a case in Crime No. 374 of 2016 was registered. After investigation, a final report was filed on 25.06.2018 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alandur. To quash the same, the petitioner has filed Criminal Original Petition No. 29269 of 2019 before this Court and the same is pending.
2.5 In the meantime, on the basis of the complaint dated 19.10.2018, the first respondent issued a show cause notice dated 28.11.2018 calling upon the petitioner and others to submit their explanation. The petitioner submitted a reply on 11.01.2019 narrating the circumstances which led to the issuance of Medical Certificate. It is his explanation that the medical certificate has been issued with a bonafide intention by adhering to the norms. In his reply, the petitioner also referred to the delay in filing the complaint by the third respondent, three years after he issued a certificate and this delay, according to him, vitiates the entir
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant's issuance of a misleading and false medical certificate constituted professional misconduct, as per the Tamil Nadu Medical Coun....
Medical practitioners are entitled to fair procedures and natural justice, particularly concerning allegations of infamous conduct, which must align with specific misconduct definitions.
Regulation 7.7 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, allows for the removal of a doctor's name from the register for professional misconduct, b....
Issuance of medical certificate – Mental Illness – Doctors are morally & ethically bound to maintain confidentiality.
The notice issued for disciplinary action against a medical practitioner must comply with mandatory procedural requirements, failing which it is considered void and unenforceable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.