BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
V. BHARATHIDASAN, S. ANANTHI, JJ.
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent
R.T. (MD) No. 1 of 2021, Crl. Appeal (MD) No. 57 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2021
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 366, 313 and 428 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 , 316 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 106 and 165 - Murder Offence - Appeal against conviction - Deceased in this case, is wife of accused - Accused and deceased were married five years prior to occurrence, they were blessed with two children and at time of occurrence, deceased was six months pregnant - Suspecting fidelity of deceased, accused harassed her – There was a quarrel, in which, accused attacked deceased in stomach and private part of deceased, strangulated her with her Mangala Suthra thread and deceased became unconscious - Held, Circumstantial evidence is of an unimpeachable character in establishing guilt of accused and leads to an exceptional case or evidence sufficiently convinces judicial mind that option of a sentence lesser than death penalty is foreclosed, death penalty can be imposed - Accused was aged about 31 years at time of occurrence and he had no bad antecedents - Accused has a chance to reform and rehabilitated, and instant case falls short of ‘rarest of rare cases’ category and Court is of considered view that mitigating circumstances outfaced aggravating circumstances – Court is of view that imposing death sentence does not warrant in case, on other hand imposing life imprisonment will meet ends of justice - Appeal partly allowed.
JUDGMENT :
V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.
1. The reference in R.T. (MD) No. 1 of 2021, is made by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Theni, under Section 366 Cr.P.C. seeking confirmation of capital punishment imposed on the accused. Crl. Appeal (MD) No. 57 of 2021, is filed by the accused challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on him and both the matters are heard together and disposed of with this common Judgment.
2. The appellant is the sole accused, in S.C. No. 81 of 2016, on file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Theni. He stood charged for the offences under Sections 302 and 316 I.P.C. The trial Court convicted the accused on both the charges and sentenced him to undergo death sentence and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo ten years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- in default to undergo two years Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 316 I.P.C. The trial Court made the reference to this court seeking confirmation of death sentence, and the appellant challenging the conviction and sentence, filed the appeal.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:
4. PW-17, the Sub-Inspector of Police, attached to respondent Police Station, on receipt of the complaint, registered a criminal case in Crime No. 533 of 2015, under Section 174(3) Cr.P.C. sent the First Information Report (Ex.P.9) to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam and also sent copies to the higher officials.
5. PW-18, Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, conducted inquest on the dead body and prepared inquest report (Ex.P.10), he was of the opinion that, the accused harassed the deceased and it is a suspicious death.
6. PW-20, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodi, on receipt of the First Information Report, commenced the investigation, visited the scene of occurrence, prepared Observation Mahazar (Ex.P.11) and Rough Sketch (Ex.P.12) and recorded the statement of witnesses. Based on the initial investigation and also the inquest report filed by PW-18, he altered the F.I.R. for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and filed the alteration report (Ex.P.13).
7. In
Amrutlal Someshwar Joshi vs. State of Maharashtra
Bishnu Prasad Sinha vs. State of Assam
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Hanumant vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kalu Khan vs. State of Rajasthan
Kalu vs. State of M.P. (2019) 10 SCC 211
Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab
Shivaji vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Punjab vs. Karnail Singh
Shambhu Nath Mehra vs. State of Ajmer
Swamy Sharaddananda vs. State of Karnataka
State of West Bengal vs. Mir Mohammad Omar
Shatrughna Baban Meshram vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.