SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2839

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
V. BHARATHIDASAN, S. ANANTHI, JJ.
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent
R.T. (MD) No. 1 of 2021, Crl. Appeal (MD) No. 57 of 2021
Decided On : 17-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Hassan Mohammed Jinnah, Mr. S. Ravi.
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Muthusaravanan, Mr. M. Jegadeesh Pandian.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 366, 313 and 428 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 , 316 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 106 and 165 - Murder Offence - Appeal against conviction - Deceased in this case, is wife of accused - Accused and deceased were married five years prior to occurrence, they were blessed with two children and at time of occurrence, deceased was six months pregnant - Suspecting fidelity of deceased, accused harassed her – There was a quarrel, in which, accused attacked deceased in stomach and private part of deceased, strangulated her with her Mangala Suthra thread and deceased became unconscious - Held, Circumstantial evidence is of an unimpeachable character in establishing guilt of accused and leads to an exceptional case or evidence sufficiently convinces judicial mind that option of a sentence lesser than death penalty is foreclosed, death penalty can be imposed - Accused was aged about 31 years at time of occurrence and he had no bad antecedents - Accused has a chance to reform and rehabilitated, and instant case falls short of ‘rarest of rare cases’ category and Court is of considered view that mitigating circumstances outfaced aggravating circumstances – Court is of view that imposing death sentence does not warrant in case, on other hand imposing life imprisonment will meet ends of justice - Appeal partly allowed.

JUDGMENT :

V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.

1. The reference in R.T. (MD) No. 1 of 2021, is made by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Theni, under Section 366 Cr.P.C. seeking confirmation of capital punishment imposed on the accused. Crl. Appeal (MD) No. 57 of 2021, is filed by the accused challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on him and both the matters are heard together and disposed of with this common Judgment.

2. The appellant is the sole accused, in S.C. No. 81 of 2016, on file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Theni. He stood charged for the offences under Sections 302 and 316 I.P.C. The trial Court convicted the accused on both the charges and sentenced him to undergo death sentence and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo ten years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- in default to undergo two years Simple Imprisonment for the offence under Section 316 I.P.C. The trial Court made the reference to this court seeking confirmation of death sentence, and the appellant challenging the conviction and sentence, filed the appeal.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:

    The deceased in this case, Karpagavalli, is the wife of the accused. PW-1 is the father of the deceased and PW-11 is her mother. The accused and deceased were married five years prior to the occurrence, they were blessed with two children and at the time of occurrence, the deceased was six months pregnant. Suspecting the fidelity of the deceased, the accused harassed her. Earlier, a complaint has been filed by the wife alleging harassment before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodinayakanur; the same was enquired and the police advised the accused and closed the complaint. On 21.07.2015, at about 3.30 p.m. there was a quarrel, in which, the accused attacked the deceased in the stomach and private part of the deceased, strangulated her with her Mangala Suthra thread and the deceased became unconscious. Then accused himself took her to the Chinnamanur Government Hospital and falsely informed the doctor that, she attempted to commit suicide by hanging. PW-10, Doctor, on examination, found her unconscious, found ligature mark measuring 3x2cm in the neck and the private part swollen with bleeding. After giving the first aid, PW-10, referred her to Theni Government Medical College Hospital and issued Accident Register (Ex.P.6), where she was admitted and given treatment. On the next day, on 22.07.2015, at about 10.20 a.m. the deceased succumbed to the injuries, PW-9, a doctor, working in the said hospital declared her death, sent death intimation (Ex.P5) to the respondent police and sent the body to mortuary for postmortem/autopsy. In the mean time, PW-1, along with his relatives went to the hospital, suspecting foul play in the death of the deceased, went to the respondent police station and filed a complaint (Ex.P.1).

4. PW-17, the Sub-Inspector of Police, attached to respondent Police Station, on receipt of the complaint, registered a criminal case in Crime No. 533 of 2015, under Section 174(3) Cr.P.C. sent the First Information Report (Ex.P.9) to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam and also sent copies to the higher officials.

5. PW-18, Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, conducted inquest on the dead body and prepared inquest report (Ex.P.10), he was of the opinion that, the accused harassed the deceased and it is a suspicious death.

6. PW-20, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodi, on receipt of the First Information Report, commenced the investigation, visited the scene of occurrence, prepared Observation Mahazar (Ex.P.11) and Rough Sketch (Ex.P.12) and recorded the statement of witnesses. Based on the initial investigation and also the inquest report filed by PW-18, he altered the F.I.R. for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and filed the alteration report (Ex.P.13).

7. In

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top