A. S. Murali vs K. R. Devandrier - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 4282

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2013 Supreme(Mad) 4282

R.KARUPPIAH
A. S. Murali – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Devandrier – Respondent

ORDER :

R. Karuppiah, J.—

1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants/defendants and the respondent/plaintiff. The applicants have filed earlier two applications namely A. Nos. 4820 and 4821 of 2012 to permit them to file additional documents and to recall DW1 witness to file additional proof affidavit and additional documents. Later, the same applicants filed A. No. 756 of 2013 to permit them to file the additional written statement in the suit.

2. The suit is filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the applicants/defendants for infringement of trademark and the above said suit is in part heard stage and is posted for further evidence of defendants. In the said circumstances, the applicants/defendants have filed these three applications A. Nos. 4820 & 4821 of 2012 and A. No. 756 of 2013 to receive the additional documents, to recall DW1 witness and to mark the above said documents and also to receive additional written statement. In the said applications, it is stated that earlier the jewellery business was joint family business and they had started their business under the name and style of 'New Jewellery' in the name of defendants' brother one S. Kumar. It is also stated that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document