IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, J.
K.Balasubramaniam - Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation and ors. – Respondents
WP.Nos.18534, 19392, 19914, 20371, 20551, 20634, 20747, 20758, 20957, 21029, 21151, 21169, 21172, 21173, 21175, 21449, 21757, 21776, 21805, 21810, 21973, 21979, 21977, 22146, 22189, 22221, 22225, 22227, 22234, 22240, 22294, 22595, 22710, 22735, 23291, 23374, 23444, 23612, 23914, 23919, 23922, 23925, 24127, 24159, 24161, 24163, 24296, 24297, 24301, 24362, 24367, 24368, 24454, 24460, 24462, 24869, 23365, 25244, 25331, 25482, 25564, 25567, 25565, 25603, 25718, 25722,25818 25888, 25889, 25890, 25894, 26056 & 25897 of 2022, WP.Nos.26134, 26173, 26179, 26183, 26187, 26190, 26174, 26180, 26184, 26188, 26176, 26182, 26186, 26189, 26193, 26198, 26228, 26230, 26235, 26237, 26244, 26232, 26236, 26238, 26242, 26279, 26357, 26484, 26559, 26577, 26621, 26622, 26686, 26736, 26742, 26786, 26790, 26798, 26800, 26791, 26794, 26799, 26796, 27014, 27183, 27184, 27213, 27252, 27256, 27258, 27336, 27337, 27341, 27431, 27939, 27985, 27989, 27992, 28037, 28101, 28377, 28380, 28474, 28654, 28660, 28663, 28662, 28666, 28670, 28842, 28959, 29059, 29085, 29196, 29204, 29247, 29442, 29470, 29478, 29485, 29483, 29488, 29490, 29495, 29497, 29501, 29489, 29493, 29499, 29502, 29503, 29507, 29494, 29500, 29504, 29506, 29508, 29509, 29896, 29942, 29946, 29947, 29951, 29954, 29996, 30078, 30083, 30091, 30097, 30105, 30106, 30115, 30118, 30288, 30290, 30295, 30300, 30303, 30383, 30405, 30423, 30446, 30448, 30455, 30574, 30612, 30616, 30854, 30863, 31154, 31177, 31188, 31190, 31219, 31221, 31224, 31225, 31251, 31288, 31411, 31414, 31430, 31435, 31560, 31713, 31732, 31744, 31774, 31882, 31886, 31977, 31982, 32087, 32208 & 32211 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.17875, 17876, 18691, 18693, 19216, 19217, 19561, 19560, 19679, 19957, 19759, 19761, 19835, 19840, 19966, 19967, 20041, 20152, 20170, 20173, 20174, 20175, 20447, 20449, 20773, 20800, 20802, 20803, 20830, 20831, 20823, 20825, 20997, 21001, 20999, 21146, 21202, 21205, 21251, 21249, 21250, 21252, 21253, 21255, 21256, 21258, 21259, 21261, 21262, 21260, 21263, 21324, 21326, 21641, 21642, 21733, 21734, 21760, 21763, 22243, 22245, 22391, 22325, 22576, 22918, 22921, 22926, 22927, 22931, 22932, 22933, 22934, 23097, 23098, 23133, 23135, 23137, 23284, 23285, 23286, 23288, 23289, 23290, 23360, 23361, 23363, 23364, 23365, 23366, 23408, 23409, 23412, 23413, 23415, 23417, 23809, 19472, 19469, 19470, 22316, 24194, 24196, 24308, 24482, 24483, 24547, 24549, 24555, 24557, 24550, 24553, 24605, 24606, 24773, 24778 of 2022 24883, 24884 24885, 24965, 24967, 24966, 24968, 24969, 24970, 24974, 24975, 24979, 25133 & 24981 of 2022, WMP.Nos.25213, 25270, 25273, 25279, 25282, 25285, 25271, 25274, 25280, 25283, 25272, 25277, 25281, 25284, 25287, 25289, 25312, 25313, 25315, 25318, 25326, 25314, 25317, 25319, 25322, 25356, 25428, 25550, 25618, 25619, 25634, 25635, 25668, 25669, 25670, 25671, 25672, 25673, 25743, 25747, 25789, 25797, 25798, 25838, 25842, 25850, 25853, 25846, 25849, 25852, 25851, 26232, 26234, 26385, 26389, 26412, 26414, 26415, 26448, 26449, 26451, 26452, 26454, 26455, 26522, 26524, 26526, 26527, 26533, 26534, 26626, 26629, 27230, 27280, 27281, 27282, 27326, 27327, 27383, 27687, 27683, 27783, 27784, 27785, 27936, 27937, 27941, 27943, 27945, 27946, 27944, 27947, 27950, 27952, 27954, 27955, 28134, 28135, 28246, 28376, 28343, 28344, 28368, 28369, 28494, 28495, 28496, 28498, 28499, 28500, 28544, 28815, 28816, 28778, 28780, 28825, 28826, 28838, 28839, 28833, 28837, 28841, 28843, 28846, 28848, 28852, 28856, 28860, 28862, 28865, 28868, 28845, 28847, 28851, 28853, 28858, 28861, 28866, 28867, 28870, 28872, 28878, 28879, 28854, 28855, 28863, 28864, 28871, 28873, 28875, 28877, 28880, 28881, 28882, 28883, 29289, 29291, 29342, 29343, 29345, 29346, 29338, 29339, 29351, 29352, 29357, 29358, 29410, 29496, 29497, 29502, 29503, 29516, 29517, 29520, 29521, 29531, 29532, 29534, 29536, 29548, 29550, 29554, 29555, 29725, 29726, 29731, 29732, 29734, 29735, 29740, 29741, 29744, 29745, 29818, 29819, 29835, 29836, 29855, 29856, 29877, 29878, 29879, 29880, 29883, 29884, 29888, 29890, 29891, 29997, 29998, 30052, 30053, 30054, 30055, 30262, 30263, 30270, 30273, 30587, 30588, 30604, 30615, 30617, 30620, 30621, 30653, 30654, 30655, 30656, 30651, 30652, 30658, 30659, 30691, 30692, 30724, 30726, 30841, 30847, 30843, 30846, 30878, 30879, 30884, 30885, 31016, 31017, 31156, 31157, 31180, 31181, 31189, 31190, 31212, 31213, 31324, 31326, 31331, 31332, 31415, 31416, 31420, 31422, 31514, 31515, 31622 & 31623 of 2022
Decided On : 23-12-2022
Writ petitions challenging enhancement of property tax in Chennai and Coimbatore. Petitioners contend that impugned G.O. and CR are liable to be quashed on grounds of violation of constitutional provisions, lack of legislative competence, and procedural irregularities. Court holds that impugned G.O. and CR are not vitiated by recommendations of Central Finance Commission, which are merely advisory in nature. State has power to issue executive orders in respect of subjects covered by List 2 of 7th Schedule of Constitution, but cannot interfere in occupied field. Impugned G.O. is not an exercise of authority under Article 162, but merely an advisory. CRs passed by Corporations were based on their own deliberations and discussions, and impugned G.O. was taken to be a guideline. Procedure followed by Corporations in issuing public notice, calling for objections, and disposing of objections was in accordance with law, though objections were disposed of in a farcical manner. Basis of enhancement is not arbitrary or contrary to provisions of Act. Adoption of Basic Street Rate (BSR) by State is proper and compliant with statutory prescription. Slab rate provided within BSR is permissible and not discriminatory. Writ petitions are dismissed, except for challenge to property tax General Revision Notices for period 2022-23 (II), which is allowed. Amendments will be operative on and from first half of 2023-24, i.e., 01.04.2023 onwards.
Fact of the Case:
Writ petitions challenging enhancement of property tax in Chennai and Coimbatore. Petitioners contend that impugned G.O. and CR are liable to be quashed on grounds of violation of constitutional provisions, lack of legislative competence, and procedural irregularities.
Finding of the Court:
Impugned G.O. and CR are not vitiated by recommendations of Central Finance Commission, which are merely advisory in nature. State has power to issue executive orders in respect of subjects covered by List 2 of 7th Schedule of Constitution, but cannot interfere in occupied field. Impugned G.O. is not an exercise of authority under Article 162, but merely an advisory. CRs passed by Corporations were based on their own deliberations and discussions, and impugned G.O. was taken to be a guideline. Procedure followed by Corporations in issuing public notice, calling for objections, and disposing of objections was in accordance with law, though objections were disposed of in a farcical manner. Basis of enhancement is not arbitrary or contrary to provisions of Act. Adoption of Basic Street Rate (BSR) by State is proper and compliant with statutory prescription. Slab rate provided within BSR is permissible and not discriminatory.
Issues: 1. Whether impugned G.O. and CR are vitiated by recommendations of Central Finance Commission? 2. Whether State has power to issue executive orders in respect of subjects covered by List 2 of 7th Schedule of Constitution? 3. Whether impugned G.O. is an exercise of authority under Article 162? 4. Whether CRs passed by Corporations were based on their own deliberations and discussions? 5. Whether procedure followed by Corporations in issuing public notice, calling for objections, and disposing of objections was in accordance with law? 6. Whether basis of enhancement is arbitrary or contrary to provisions of Act? 7. Whether adoption of Basic Street Rate (BSR) by State is proper and compliant with statutory prescription? 8. Whether slab rate provided within BSR is permissible and discriminatory?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Recommendations of Central Finance Commission are merely advisory in nature and do not bind State Governments. 2. State has power to issue executive orders in respect of subjects covered by List 2 of 7th Schedule of Constitution, but cannot interfere in occupied field. 3. Impugned G.O. is not an exercise of authority under Article 162, but merely an advisory. 4. CRs passed by Corporations were based on their own deliberations and discussions, and impugned G.O. was taken to be a guideline. 5. Procedure followed by Corporations in issuing public notice, calling for objections, and disposing of objections was in accordance with law, though objections were disposed of in a farcical manner. 6. Basis of enhancement is not arbitrary or contrary to provisions of Act. 7. Adoption of Basic Street Rate (BSR) by State is proper and compliant with statutory prescription. 8. Slab rate provided within BSR is permissible and not discriminatory.
Final Decision: Writ petitions are dismissed, except for challenge to property tax General Revision Notices for period 2022-23 (II), which is allowed. Amendments will be operative on and from first half of 2023-24, i.e., 01.04.2023 onwards.
ORDER :
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records starting from the Council resolution No.63/2022 dated 30.05.2022 passed by the Council of the Greater Chennai Corporation and the consequential proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 28.06.2022 issuing Form No.1 calling it as property tax General Revision Notice 2022-23, Ref.No.I/1/22-23/948253 and quash the entire proceedings, being illegal and ultravires to the provisions of Section 100 of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919.
(Prayer amended vide order dated 29.08.2022 in WMP No.19469 of 2022)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records leading to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.53 dated 30.03.2022 and the Council Resolution No.63 of 2022 dated 30.05.2022 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records and quash the G.O.Ms.No.53 dated 30.03.2022 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department is unlawful and unconstitutional and direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to determine the revision of tax in accordance with law.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned G.O.Ms.No.53 Municipal Administration and Water Supply (M.A.IV) Department dated 30.03.2022 issued by the first respondent and impugned Notice No.1, Property Tax General Revision 2022-23, Property Tax General Revision Notice 2022-23, vide Notice No.GR-2022SPL/162/422891, dated 08.07.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent, received on 17.10.2022 and quash quash the same as ultra vires and unconstitutional beyond the legislative competence.
A welfare State has necessarily to balance augmenting of its revenues so as to provide for sources of funds for welfare measures and other expenses of the State on the one hand, and mitigating the hardship of taxes as far as possible to its citizens, on the other.
2. The official website of the Income Tax Department refers to the perfect balance achieved by the emperor Manu in this regard stating that ‘As the calf and the bee take their food little by little, even so must the king draw from his realm moderate, annual taxes’. One would assume that this would constitute the method of exaction in all revenue matters, whether Central or State. That said, it is also an admitted position that the taxes imposed on property assume a lions’ share of the resources of the State and thus, the power of the State, nay, the necessity to do so, albeit in a legal, fair and transparent matter, is beyond question.
3. The challenge in the present matters is of three kinds:
Though the sweep of the G.O. encompasses the entirety of the State of Tamil Nadu, only the Commissioner and other authorities of the Greater Chennai and Coimbatore Municipal Corporations are arrayed as respondents. In some of the Writ Petitions, the State has also been arrayed as a respondent.
b) Property tax General Revision Notices for period 2022-23, i.e., from 01.04.2022 onwards, which is the effective date for implementation of the new tax rates.
c) The new tax rates are structured on a slab basis and this has come to be questioned in a few Writ Petit
B.N.Nagarajan and others V. State of Mysore and others
Commissioner v. Griha Yajamanula Samkhya and Others
Corporation of Calcutta v. Smt. Padma Debi
D.S. Nakara and others V. Union of India
East India Commercial Company Private Limited v. Corporation of Calcutta
Guntur Municipal Council v. Guntur Town Rate Payers’ Association, etc.
Indore Municipality v. Ratnaprabhu
Lokmanya Mills Barsi Ltd. v. Barsi Borough Municipality, Barsi
Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another v. Mehrasons Jewellers Private Limited
Municipal Corporation, Indore & Others v. Smt. Ratna Prabha & Others
New Delhi Municipal Council and Others v. Association of Concerned Citizens of New Delhi and Others
Patel Gordhandas Hargovindas and Others v. Municipal Commissioner, Ahmedabad and Another
Municipal authority must act within jurisdiction and statutory mandates during property valuation revisions; arbitrary actions are subject to judicial scrutiny.
The liability for property tax remains with the original owner despite property transfer, and the rateable value should reflect reasonable market conditions, adjusted to Rs.200/sq.mtr.
Tax assessment must adhere to established legal procedures; failure to follow the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act renders such challenges non-maintainable.
The court established that annual property valuations must be based on market conditions and statutory guidelines, with clear reasoning required for any modifications.
Court rules that valuation assessments must reflect actual rental expectations and conditions, affirming Tribunal's authority to adjust arbitrary figures while emphasizing tenant agreements.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.