Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
R. Thirunavukkarasu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The punishment of compulsory retirement is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner joined as Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) in the year 1983. While the petitioner was serving at the CISF Unit Visakhapatnam, he was placed under suspension in order dated 10.12.2014 and thereafter, a charge memo dated 17.01.2015 was issued to the writ petitioner under Rule 36 of the Central Industrial Security Force Rules and the following charges are framed:
That CISF No. 832311107 HC/GD R. Thirunavakarasu (U/S) of HQrs. Sector of CISF Unit VPT Vizag, when posted at CISF Unit VSP Vizag was detailed for Gate Control Duty at Old Vehicle Out Gate of BC Gate area of VSP, Vizag from 16:30 hrs to 18:00 hrs on 02.12.2014. During the said duty he was found taking a Hundred Rupees Note bearing No. 2VK 888409 from Md. Munna Babu Basha, driver of Vehicle No. KA-35N-4204 (Maruti Omni Van) as illegal gratification. Thus such act amounts to gross misconduct, dishonesty, indiscipline and an act of unbecoming conduct on his part being a member of disciplined Force. Hence the Charge.
Article of Charge II:
That CISF No. 832311107 HC/GD R. Th
The court established that the punishment of compulsory retirement must be proportionate to the gravity of the proved charges and should consider the previous conduct of the employee.
The principle of proportionality of punishment is crucial in determining the appropriate penalty for proved charges of misconduct.
The punishment of compulsory retirement was disproportionate to the gravity of the offense of having excess pocket money.
The court upheld the disciplinary authority's decision on compulsory retirement, emphasizing limited judicial review regarding the appropriateness of punishment imposed, unless it is found to be shoc....
The Court upheld the penalty of removal from service based on the petitioner's admission of charges, failure to submit written explanations, and the consideration of the petitioner's previous conduct....
The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the rules of natural justice, evidence-based findings of misconduct, and the proportionality of punishment in disciplinary proceedings.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings, the need for evidence to reasonably support the conclusion of guilt, and the requirement for the penalty to b....
In judicial review of disciplinary matters, courts do not re-appreciate evidence or sit as appellate authorities. Interference is restricted to cases involving violation of natural justice, procedura....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's act of unauthorized absence from duty constituted 'misconduct' under the CISF Rules, leading to the imposition of the punishm....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
