SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1143

S. S. SUNDAR
S. P. A. Legends Resorts Private Ltd. , Rep. by its Director, Farooq Ahamed Quazi – Appellant
Versus
Jayamurthy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M/s. Surana & Surana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal preferred under 100 of CPC against the decree and judgment dated 16.09.2016 in AS.No.1/2014 passed by the Lower Appellate Court namely the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, dismissing the appeal and confirming the decree and judgment dated 23.10.2013 passed in OS.No.69/2011 passed by the learned Principal District Musif, Tindivanam.)

1. The plaintiff in the suit in OS.No.69/2011 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam, is the appellant in the above Second Appeal.

2. The appellant, a private Ltd. Company, filed the suit in OS.No.69/2011 for declaration of appellant’s title in respect of the suit property and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with its possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

3. The suit property is described as a property measuring an extent of 3.29 acres in Old S.No.128/3, New S.No.200/3 in Marakkanam Village, Tindivanam Taluk.

4. The case of the plaintiff in the plaint is that the plaintiff is entitled to an extent of 2.89 acres in the suit property by virtue of a Sale Deed dated 22.12.2004 and the remaining 40 cents was purchased by the pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top