G. ARUL MURUGAN
K. Mohan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ponnammal (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 18.02.2011 made in AS.No.27 of 2010 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.09.2010 made in OS.No.330 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kangayam.)
1. The defendant in the suit is the appellant in the above appeal. The Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 18.02.2011 in A.S. No.27 of 2010 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram, confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.09.2010 in OS.No.330 of 2007 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kangayam, Erode District.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts, which gave rise to this Second Appeal, are as follows:
FGP Limited vs. Salesh Hooseini Doctor and another reported in (2009) 10 SCC 223
Ramachandra Sakharam Mahajan Vs. Damodar Trimbak Tanksale reported in (2007) 6 SCC 737
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Vasavi Cooperative Society and Ors. reported in (2014) 2 SCC 269
S.Nirmala vs. Kanniammal and others reported in 2017 (1) CTC 24.
The plaintiff's establishment of ownership to a high degree of probability shifted the onus to the defendant, leading to the plaintiff's burden of proof being deemed discharged. The suit was maintain....
The appellate court determined that the First Appellate Court erred in not properly evaluating the ownership evidence, resulting in incorrect distribution of property rights and affirming the Plainti....
In a suit for declaration of title, the burden lies on the plaintiff to establish ownership, and the courts found sufficient evidence supporting the plaintiff's claim.
A plaintiff must provide clear and specific evidence of property ownership, including boundaries, to succeed in a claim for declaration and injunction.
Registered partition deed between brothers under Mohammedan law creates valid title; High Court cannot re-appreciate facts absent substantial question of law in second appeal.
A plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction must prove both title and settled possession, failing which the claim may be dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.