SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1158

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JJ.
L. Ponnammal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Investment & Public Asset Management, New Delhi & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 4150 of 2022
Decided On : 21-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Abhishek Jebaraj, S.G. Arul Mozhi Selvan, Advocates. For the Respondents:R1 & R2, N. Venkataraman, Additional Solicitor General, Prasad Vijayakumar, R3, Satish Parasaran, Senior Counsel, B. Deepak Narayanan, Advocate.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 110 - Finance Act, 2021 - Writ petition challenging Sections 128-146 of the Finance Act, claiming they are ultra vires Article 110 - Petitioner, a policyholder of LIC, argues amendment reduces entitlement to surplus - Central issue whether these amendments qualify as a Money Bill under Article 110. (Paras 1, 4, 7, 28, 34)

(B) Money Bills - Definition and Scope - Articles 109 and 110 - Provisions deemed Money Bills must deal solely with specific issues listed under Article 110(1). The definition has been interpreted broadly in precedent - A Bill meeting primary provisions can include incidental matters. (Paras 33, 36, 37)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, as a LIC policyholder, contests amendments from Finance Act, 2021, alleging infringement of rights due to classification as a Money Bill despite them not meeting specified subject matters in Article 110. The amendments involve the financial interests of policyholders by reducing surplus entitlements.

Findings of Court:
No merits in the writ petition as amendments conform to legal provisions under Article 110 and relevant certifications. The process for certifying the Finance Bill as a Money Bill has been followed, thus maintaining legislative integrity.

Issues: The key questions were whether the amendments qualify as Money Bill provisions and if they infringe constitutional mandates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that the legislative intent and amendments fall within the definition of a Money Bill, rejecting claims of unconstitutionality. The decision of the Speaker regarding the Bill is regarded as final due to constitutional provisions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to the finance act, 2021. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. classification of bills under the constitution. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. impact of amendments on policyholders' rights. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. arguments in defense of amendments. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. legitimacy of money bill classification. (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of declaration to (i) Declare sections 128 to 146 of the FINANCE ACT , 2021 as ultra vires Article 110 of the Constitution of India or (ii) Alternatively declare Section 5 (9) of the LIC Act 1956 and Section 128 to 130 Section 132 to 146 of the FINANCE ACT , 2021 as ultra vires Article 110 of the Constitution of India or (iii) Alternatively declare Section 140 of the FINANCE ACT , 2021 as ultra vires Article 110 of the Constitution of India.)

Munishwar Nath Bhandari, CJ.

1. By this writ petition a challenge is made to Sections 128 to 146 of the FINANCE ACT , 2021 [for brevity, “the Act of 2021”], with an alternative prayer to declare Section 5 (9) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 [for brevity, “the Act of 1956”] and Sections 128 to 130 and Sections 132 to 146 of the Act of 2021 as ultra vires Article 110 of the Constitution of India. An alternative prayer is also made to declare Section 140 of the Act of 2021 as ultra vires Article 110 of the Constitution of India.

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a policyholder of the Life Insurance Corporation (for brevity, “the LIC”) and being aggrieved by Sections 128 to 146 of the Act of 2021, as also Section 5 (9) of the Act of 1956, she has filed this writ petition. It is mainly on the premise that the provisions aforesaid were introduced by a Money Bill under Article 110 of the Constitution of India, though the amendment does not fall in the category of Money Bill.

3. Coming to the facts of the case, it is submitted that every participating policyholder was entitled to a minimum of 90% of the surplus arising from non-participating policies, but the amendment under challenge has reduced their entitlement to nil and, therefore, being a policyholder, she has challenged Sections 128 to 146 of the Act of 2021, apart from Section 5 (9) of the Act of 1956.

4. Narrating the facts further, it is submitted that by virtue of Part III of Chapter VI of the Act of 2021, the Parliament has amended the Act of 1956 and made substantial changes to various facets of the LIC. The amendment by way of the Act of 2021 was brought after the Finance Bill, 2021 was classified by the Speaker of the House of the People under Article 110 of the Constitution of India as a Money Bill. The certificate for it was issued by the Speaker of the House of the People under clause (4) of Article 110 of the Constitution of India and has been appended along with the writ petition. The Speaker of the House of the People has issued the certificate even though the Finance Bill, 2021 contained matters other than those specified in sub-clauses (a) to (f) of clause (1) of Article 110 of the Constitution of India. The challenge to the amendments has been made primarily on the ground that the subject-matter therein does not fall in the specified matters given under Article 110 of the Constitution of India and it would otherwise result in reduction in the share of surplus allocated to participating policyholders.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to the constitutional provisions, submitted that there are different types of Bills under the Constitution of India which are as under:

(a) Ordinary Bills governed by Article 107 of the Constitution of India;

(b) Financial Bills governed by Article 117 of the Constitution of India; and,

(c) Money Bills governed by Article 109 of the Constitution of India.

6. Referring to the features of the Money Bill in reference to Articles 109 and 110 of the Constitution of India, it is submitted that definition of “Money Bills” has been given under Art

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top