SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1260

R. THARANI
P. Ramanathan – Appellant
Versus
Backiyam(died) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:M/s. A. Haja Mohideen, Advocate. For the Respondents:R2 to R6, K. Vamanan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment in A.S.No.42 of 2011 passed by the Subordinate Court, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District dated 11.10.2013 confirming the decree and judgment in O.S.No.152 of 2007 passed by the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi dated 25.02.2011.)

1. This appeal is filed against the order in A.S.No.42 of 2011 passed by the Subordinate Court, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District dated 11.10.2013, confirming the decree and judgment in O.S.No. 152 of 2007 passed by the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi, dated 25.02.2011.

2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff in the suit. The respondents 1 to 3 are the defendants in the suit and the respondents 4 to 6 are the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent.

3. A brief substance of the plaint is as follows: The suit property belonged to the father of the plaintiff and his brother Jeyaraman Chettiar. The suit property was allotted to the share of the father of the plaintiff. The father of the plaintiff had three sons and one daughter. The second defendant is the daughter. The second defendant is the sister of the plaintiff. Since sufficient

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top