SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1263

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
Hosur Industries Association, Rep. by its authorized signatory P. Arulanandan - Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Chennai & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 23975 of 2021
Decided On : 04-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:G. Balasubramanian, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1, R. Siddharth, Government Advocate, R3, S. Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader, R2, N. Subbarayalu, Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the discretion to grant special exemptions for property tax lies with the Council with the sanction of the Government, and exemptions are granted in public interest.

Headnote:

Property Tax - Exemption for Industrial Association - Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981, Hosur City Municipal Corporation Act, 2019 - Section 124 of Coimbatore Act - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the applicability of Section 124 of the Coimbatore Act and its extension to the levy and collection of property tax under the provisions of the Hosur Act. The court analyzed the provisions of property tax, special exemptions, and alternative bases of property tax under the Coimbatore Act and compared them with the Chennai Act. The court highlighted the discretion of the Council to grant special exemptions with the sanction of the Government and the criteria for granting such exemptions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an Association representing industrial undertakings, challenged the denial of special exemption under Section 124 of the Coimbatore Act for property tax levied on its members in the SIPCOT Industrial Area. The petitioner argued that the infrastructure provided by SIPCOT justified the exemption.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the industrial units were not exempted under Section 123 of the Coimbatore Act and that the discretion to grant special exemptions rested with the Council with the sanction of the Government. The court also emphasized that exemptions are granted in public interest and cannot be claimed as a matter of right by individuals.

Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of Section 124 of the Coimbatore Act, the applicability of special exemptions to industrial areas, and the discretion of the Council to grant exemptions with the sanction of the Government.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the discretion to grant special exemptions for property tax lies with the Council with the sanction of the Government, and exemptions are granted in public interest. The court emphasized that the petitioner failed to demonstrate public interest for granting special exemptions.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the Writ Petition, ruling that the petitioner's claim for special exemption from property tax was not justified, and the discretion to grant exemptions rested with the Council with the sanction of the Government.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Na.Ka.No.5483/2018/AI, dated 25.01.2021 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to fix the property tax providing for exemption / concession in the tax levied on the members of petitioner Association in accordance with Section 124 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 read with Section 8 of the Hosur City Municipal Corporation Act.)

1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned communication dated 25.01.2021 bearing reference No.Na.Ka.No.5483/2018/A1 of the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to fix the property tax providing for exemption/concession in the tax levied on the members of petitioner Association in accordance with Section 124 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as "Coimbatore Act") read with Section 8 of the Hosur City Municipal Corporation Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as "Hosur Act").

2. By the impugned communication dated 25.01.2021, the second respondent has rejected the request of the petitioner for grant of special exemption under the provisions of the Coimbatore Act as made applicable to levy of tax under the provisions of Hosur Act.

3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner was under the Town Panchayat and thereafter under the purview of the Hosur Act which incorporates the provisions of the Coimbatore Act as far as levy and collection of property tax.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an Association representing the interest of Industrial undertaking located in the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (hereinafter referred to as “SIPCOT”) Industrial Area. It is submitted that infrastructure such as water supply, sewerage and drainage arrangements is being provided by SIPCOT. W.M.P.No.241 of 2022 was filed for impleading SIPCOT as the fourth respondent which was allowed by an order dated 12.01.2022.

1. It is submitted that since vital service and infrastructure are being provided by the SIPCOT to the members of the petitioner's association, the impugned order/communication of the second respondent denying exemption under Section 124 of the Coimbatore Act under the provisions of the Hosur Act was incorrect.

2.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in terms of Section 124 of the Coimbatore Act, the members of the petitioner Association were entitled for special exemption as the entire area in the SIPCOT Industrial Area was not deriving any service from the first to third respondents.

7. It is the case of the Petitioner that under Proviso (a) to Section 124 of the Coimbatore Act read with Section 8 of the Hosur Act, the second respondent is empowered to provide property tax concession to the members of the petitioner Association. It is submitted that the title of Section 124 of Coimbatore Act is “Special Exemptions and Alternative Bases of Property Tax”, clearly indicates that the provision talks about exemptions provided to property tax levied under the Act by the respondents and not to water or sewerage and lighting tax.

8. Hence, applying rule of ejusdem generis “such tax” mentioned in proviso (a) could only refer to property tax and not to mere water or sewerage tax as no such differentiation is made throughout the provision and especially when the entire Part of the Act talks about property tax only.

9. It is further submitted that the provisions of Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 (hereinafter referred to as "Chennai Act") are pari materia to the provisions of Coimbatore Act. It was further pointed out that as far as property tax is concerned under Section 99 of the Chennai Act, there are tax for (i) general purposes, (


























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top