SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2661

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, DEEPAK MANCHANDA, JJ.
M/s. ASF Insignia SEZ Pvt. Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Anr. – Respondents
CWP-4096 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 24-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajesh Garg and Mr. Aashish Chopra, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Manpreet Sawhney, Mr. Javedur Rahman, Ms. Naina Matharoo and Mr. Yash Pal, Advocates.
For the Respondent No. 1: Ms. Shruti Jain Goel, DAG, Haryana.
For the Respondent No. 2/M.C. Gurugram:Mr. B.R. Mahajan Sr. Advocate with Mr. Piyush Bansal and Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocates.

Headnote:(A) Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 - Section 87 - Property tax levied on IT- ITES SEZ property at commercial rates - Petitioner contended property to be classified under industrial rates due to SEZ status - Court found no merit in petitioner's plea as tax is based on usage and classification made by Government notifications - Validity of notifications upheld, and reasoning aligns with Section 87 - Petitioner fails to demonstrate misuse of property classification. (Paras 28-49)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a company operating within an IT-ITES Special Economic Zone (SEZ), challenged a government order imposing property tax at commercial rates as opposed to industrial rates, arguing it was erroneously categorized due to its SEZ status. (Paras 1-13)

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the property tax classification is determined by actual usage per the relevant notifications, affirming the legality of the tax imposition made by the Urban Local Bodies Department. (Paras 28-49)

Issues: The main issues were the proper tax classification of the SEZ property and the applicability of the provisions of the Haryana SEZ Act and the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act in determining tax rates. (Paras 14-26)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the property tax is reliant upon the actual usage of the premises and that SEZ status does not grant immunity from local taxation as per the Municipal Corporation Act. It emphasized strict interpretation of charging provisions under taxation law. (Paras 28-41)

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to property tax classification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legislation enabling property tax rates. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. previous appeal success and re-assessment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. outcome of revisions and remands. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. petitioner’s arguments on categorization. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. various legal and procedural arguments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. defendants’ response to petitioner’s claims. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
8. overview of relevant statutory provisions. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
9. legal standards for tax determination. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
10. assessment criteria for property usage. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
11. principles of natural justice and rights. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
12. final order on the matter. (Para 48)
13. conclusion of dismissal. (Para 49)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.

Challenge in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 30.11.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Urban Local Bodies Department holding the IT- ITES, Sector Specific SEZ property of the petitioner exigible to property tax at "commercial rates".

2. A writ of mandamus is sought directing the respondents to levy property tax at "industrial rates" instead of "Commercial Rates" .

Brief Factual Matrix

3. Petitioner is stated to be a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956. It has been averred that the petitioner's property was notified as IT-ITES SEZ by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Department of Commerce, Government of India as well as by the Industries and Commerce Department, Government of Haryana. Pursuant to such approval, the petitioner's properties were leased out to various lessees for setting up of SEZ units.

4. The Haryana Government, Urban Local Bodies Department issued a notification dated 11.10.2013 in terms of Section 87 (3) read with Section 149 (1) of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act 1994 (hereinafter to be referred to as the 1994 Act') imposing property tax on buildings and lands within the limits of the concerned municipal corporation. Copy of the notification dated 11.10.2013 stands appended as Annexure P-5 alongwith the petition.

5. Thereafter the Haryana Government vide notification dated 03.03.2014 (Annexure P-6) brought out an amendment to the notification dated 11.10.2013 and inter alia inserted para 2F (xiii) and which was in the following terms:-

    "(xiii) IT Park, Cyber City/Park

    50 per cent of commercial space rate for both A1 and A2 cities respectively".

6. The respondent-Municipal Corporation, Gurugram vide communication dated 11.09.2015 called upon the petitioner to pay property tax from 2010-2011 to 2014-2015 in terms of the 2013 notification and as amended in the year 2014. Petitioner is stated to have responded on 17.09.2015 clarifying that insofar as the petitioner's property was concerned, only two buildings were operational and the residential buildings were still under construction. Petitioner also raised a plea before Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, to levy property tax on the petitioner's property by treating the same to fall under the "industrial category".

7. However, on 18.09.2015 communication was issued by Municipal Corporation Gurugram, informing that the petitioner's property had been assessed under head "IT Park, Cyber City-Park" which had been inserted in the notification dated 11.10.2013 by virtue of amendment made on 03.03.2014 and as such the property tax liable to be levied was 50 per cent of the rates applicable to commercial properties. Demand notices dated 11.09.2015 were as such issued by the Joint Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram for recovery of property tax for the period 2010-11 to 2015-16. At this stage, petitioner filed CWP No.20789 of 2015 titled as M/s ASF Insignia SEZ Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation , Gurugram assailing the demand notices dated 11.09.2015 demanding property tax under the commercial category. In th

                                                                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                                            1
                                                                                            2
                                                                                            3
                                                                                            4
                                                                                            5
                                                                                            6
                                                                                            7
                                                                                            8
                                                                                            9
                                                                                            10
                                                                                            11
                                                                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                                            supreme today icon
                                                                                            logo-black

                                                                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                                            qr

                                                                                            Scan Me!

                                                                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top