G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Rukmani – Appellant
Versus
Rengammal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2020 made in A.S.No.59 of 2017 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.09.2017 made in O.S.No.170 of 2014 on the file of the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Kodumudi.)
Judgment
1. This Second Appeal is directed against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the courts below.
2. Appellant filed the suit for declaration that the Will dated 01.07.2014 executed by Kuppusamy Naidu is not true, valid and unenforceable; (2) to divide the suit properties into 16 equal shares and allot 5 such shares to her; (3) for injunction restraining the second defendant from selling or alienating the suit properties; (4) and for costs.
3. The case of the appellant is that the first respondent is her mother, second respondent is her brother, fifth respondent is her sister, third and fourth respondents are the children of second respondent. She filed the suit against the respondents claiming that the suit items 1 to 6 are ancestral properties, items 7 and 8 were purchased by their father Kuppus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.