SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1322

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
K. Subramaniam & Another - Appellant
Versus
I.C. Shanmugavelayutham - Respondent
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 19694 of 2021 & Crl.M.P(MD) Nos. 11046 & 11047 of 2021
Decided On : 17-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:V.R. Shanmuganathan, Advocate. For the Respondent:D. Nallathambi, Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 362 of Cr.P.C to determine the abuse of process of law.

Headnote:

Abuse of Process of Law - Criminal Proceedings - Section 362 of Cr.P.C - [ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW] - [CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS] - [Section 362 of Cr.P.C] - The court discussed the abuse of process of law and the provision under Section 362 of Cr.P.C, which states that no court shall alter or review the order except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The court found that the present complaint lodged by the respondent was an abuse of process of law and quashed the entire proceedings as against the petitioners.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who were office bearers of a school, were accused of misappropriating school funds. The initial complaint was found false and closed, but the respondent filed a new complaint after a significant delay.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the present complaint was an abuse of process of law and quashed the proceedings against the petitioners.

Issues: The main issue was whether the present complaint lodged by the respondent was a valid legal action or an abuse of process of law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the provision under Section 362 of Cr.P.C and found that the present complaint was an abuse of process of law.

Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was allowed, and the proceedings in C.C.No.597 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, were quashed as against the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to C.C.No.597 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli and to quash the same.)

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.597 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli.

2. The petitioners are arraigned as Accused Nos.1 and 2. The first petitioner was the Secretary of Ramasamy Pillai Higher Secondary School, Ilanji, Tenkasi Taluk for the period from 23.05.2000 to 31.05.2009. Then from 05.08.2012 till 22.01.2016. He was also President of the said School from 01.06.2009 to 04.08.2012. The second petitioner was the Secretary of the School from 01.06.2009 to 04.08.2012 and the President of the said School from 05.08.2012 to 22.01.2016. While being so, the school accounts related to self-finance English medium sections and self finance Computer and Science sections were not subjected to audit, since no aid was given from the Government. Though the School's other accounts were subjected to audit till 2011-2012, however, in the year 2013, the School was directed to submit the accounts from 2001-2002 to 2012-2013. The Zonal Audit Officer, Madurai, had given report to the Director of School Education stating that during the Special Audit it was found that the School have not maintained proper collection register and cash register for the amounts received by the School in those self-finance sections. In this regard, one Pichaya, who was a member of Ilanji Kalvi Sangam, lodged a complaint on 04.04.2013 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli, alleging that the petitioners have misappropriated the School funds without proper maintenance of records. It was forwarded under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C to the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli. On receipt of the order, the F.I.R has been registered in Crime No.11 of 2013 for the offence under Section 420 of I.P.C. After completion of investigation, it was found that the said complaint was false and the same was closed as 'mistake of fact' by the closure report, dated 29.04.2014.

3. On receipt of the referred charge-sheet, the said Pichaya filed a protest petition in Crl.M.P.No.6514 of 2014, in which, the learned Magistrate ordered for further investigation. As directed by the learned Magistrate, further investigation was conducted and found that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the said Pichaya and dropped the further investigation. To that effect, a report was filed and the same has been taken on file and accepted the same. It was also recorded on 23.01.2018 itself. After a period of two years, the respondent herein filed a petition under Section 190(1)(a) and 200 of Cr.P.C to take up the issue again as private complaint for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120(b) of I.P.C r/w Section 34 of I.P.C in Crime No.11 of 2013. On receipt of the same, the learned Magistrate, by an order, dated 23.10.2021 found that there is a prima facie case to proceed further and accordingly had taken cognizance in C.C.No.597 of 2021 and issued summons to the petitioners.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

5. Admittedly, the earlier complaint lodged by the said Pichaya is also one of the member of the Ilanji Kalvi Sangam and the same has been closed as 'mistake of fact' by a report, dated 29.04.2014. In fact, in his protest petition in Crl.M.P.No.6514 of 2014 further investigation was ordered and the same was closed even as early as on 23.01.2018. For the very same set of allegations, the present private complaint has been filed by the respondent in the very same crime number, which was already closed as 'mistake of fact'. It is relevant to extract the provision under Section 362 of Cr.P.C, which reads as follows:-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top