Back
A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Thilagavathy – Appellant
Versus
Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance & Anti-Corruption Department, Villupuram – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Spl.C.No.13 of 2022 on the file of the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Villupuram.)
1. The present petition has been filed seeking to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Spl.C.No.13 of 2022 on the file of the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Villupuram.
2. Facts, in brief, behind the filing of the present petition are as under:-
i) The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, had joined as Headmistress cum Hostel Warden in Government Tribal Residential Middle School (GTR Middle School), Paranginatham, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District, a School for denotified community and was serving so during the check period from 1.8.2011 to 10.9.2014 and subsequently, she was transferred to ADW Middle School, Namachivayapuram and has been continuing there.
ii) During the said check period, A2 to A11 in the present criminal proceedings were serving as Teachers in the same school.
iii) During the check period, a Preliminary Enquiry in No.123/2014/EDN/VPM was conducted as per the
The court emphasized that the power to quash a criminal proceeding should be exercised sparingly and with circumspection, and only in the rarest of rare cases, and that the court will not be justifie....
The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of forgery or misappropriation against the petitioner, leading to the quashing of all proceedings.
A second prosecution for the same offense and facts is barred by the principles of double jeopardy. Furthermore, post-trial commencement, investigating agencies cannot conduct further investigations ....
The court ruled that the absence of dishonest intention in the allegations against the petitioners justified quashing the criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
The court held that specific allegations in the FIR warranted a trial, as they disclosed a cognizable offence, and the delay in filing the FIR did not negate the prosecution's case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 362 of Cr.P.C to determine the abuse of process of law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the ab....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
