Back
S. VAIDYANATHAN, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
E. P. Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Vellore – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ appeal is filed under clause 15 of the Letter Patent praying to set aside the order dated 05.06.2018 in W.P.No.22063 of 2016.)
Mohammed Shaffiq, J.
1. This intra-court appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.22063 of 2016 whereby the appellant's prayer to quash the record/ communication of the Accountant General/ 6th respondent dated 02.05.2016 and to further direct the 6th respondent to sanction the pension to the appellant/ writ petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.37 (School Education) dated 05.01.1983 was rejected.
2. Brief facts:
The appellant joined as a Secondary Grade Headmaster in Nehruji Aided School at Edapalayam Village, Vellore District. After serving in the above institution, the appellant resigned from service in September 1974. Subsequent to his resignation, Secretary to Government (School Education) issued a Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.1015 dated 05.06.1981 with regard to pension to staff of Non-Government Educational Institutions, teaching staff of aided and local body schools and teaching staff of aided colleges who resigned before the relevant crucial dates. The scope of the said G.O.Ms.No.1015 dated 05.06.19
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a liberal interpretation of pension provisions and the recognition of pension as a continuous relief/right for the employee, which sho....
Pension eligibility for non-teaching staff is contingent upon resignation before the crucial date; those resigning after are ineligible for benefits.
Vested rights cannot be retroactively revoked by legislative amendments unless explicitly stated, ensuring protection under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Resignation does not qualify as voluntary retirement under Rule 66 of the Pension Rules, and service on fixed pay is not eligible for pension.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the respondent No.4 is entitled to pension benefits as her application for voluntary retirement ought to have been accepted in the year 2003 i....
The court emphasized the importance of timely redressal of grievances and the plain and unambiguous interpretation of statutory provisions.
Resignation without proper permission under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules forfeits past service, and delay in claiming benefits undermines entitlement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
